A clinicopathological-imaging nomogram for the prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer cases administered neoadjuvant therapy
Wei Yang,Yan Yang,Chaolin Zhang,Qingyun Yin,Ningmei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.002
IF: 3.13
2024-05-04
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Objective To construct a user-friendly nomogram with MRI and clinicopathological parameters for the prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with breast cancer (BC). Methods We retrospectively enrolled consecutive female patients pathologically confirmed with breast cancer who received NAT followed by surgery between January 2018 and December 2022 as the development cohort. Additionally, we prospectively collected eligible candidates between January 2023 and December 2023 as an external validation group at our institution. Pretreatment MRI features and clinicopathological variables were collected, and the pre- and post-treatment background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and the changes in BPE on two MRIs were compared between patients who achieved pCR and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with pCR in the development cohort. These independent variables were combined into a predictive nomogram for which performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plot, decision curve analysis, and external validation. Results In the development cohort, there were a total of 276 female patients with a mean age of 48.3 ± 8.7 years, while in the validation cohort, there were 87 female patients with a mean age of 49.0 ± 9.5 years. Independent prognostic factors of pCR included small tumor size, HER2(+), high Ki-67 index,high signal enhancement ratio (SER), low minimum value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC min ), and significantly decreased BPE after NAT(change of BPE). The nomogram, which incorporates the above parameters, demonstrated excellent predictive performance in both the development and external validation cohorts, with AUC values of 0.900 and 0.850, respectively. Additionally, the nomogram showed excellent calibration capacities, as indicated by Hosmer-Lemeshow test p values of 0.508 and 0.423 in the two cohorts. Furthermore, the nomogram provided greater net benefits compared to the default simple schemes in both cohorts. Conclusion A nomogram constructed using tumor size, HER2 status, Ki-67 index, SER, ADC min , and changes in pre- and post-NAT BPE demonstrated strong predictive performance, calibration ability, and greater net benefits for predicting pCR in patients with BC after NAT. This suggests that the user-friendly nomogram could be a valuable imaging biomarker for identifying suitable candidates for NAT.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging