Abstract:Background/IntroductionTo promote transparency for both the public and researchers [1, 2], our objective was to implement all HDRUK Transparency Standards within the Grampian Data Safe Haven (DaSH) [3] website [4]. Particularly, we aimed to clarify sensitive data processing within our Trusted Research Environment (TRE) and improve accessibility of ethics and governance permissions procedures to facilitate public-benefit research. MethodsUtilising Knowledge Translation [5] and Implementation Science [6] methods, we identified relevant audiences to engage with the website to develop and evaluate digital content. A holistic approach to navigation, content creation and visuality was implemented to improve user experience for diverse audiences [7], leveraging plain language strategies [8] for understanding and transparency. ResultsWe addressed Standard 1 by publishing the DaSH Project Initiation Document and clear information on data processing. For Standards 3, 4 and 5, we enhanced user experience through streamlined navigation, dropdowns, signposting, and clear language, ensuring information remains appropriate for diverse audiences. Additionally, we established a quarterly review/update cycle. For Standard 6, we documented our Governance and Security structures alongside ISO27001 certification, a Data Use Register, and an Impact list of DaSH-supported research publications. Our most significant contribution was toward Standard 2, creating detailed permissions pathways guidance documents, including visual aids and permissions application checklists. To our knowledge, we are the first UK TRE to fully document and publish all available permissions pathways [9]. ConclusionsFirst, implementing the six HDRUK Transparency Standards simultaneously enables holistic improvements to openness, maximising the benefits of their complementary recommendations. Second, publishing project lifecycle information clarifies TRE and researcher responsibilities, especially during data extraction, pseudonymisation, and linkage stages [10], fostering trust and confidence in sensitive data use and processing. Third, by documenting ethics and governance pathways available in visual, text, and downloadable formats, we have demonstrably improved ethical and research literacy for both researchers and the public. By clearly articulating an easy-to-follow process for each permissions pathway, this initiative has been identified by our audience as the most impactful improvement in making sensitive data research transparent and accessible. OtherThere were three main lessons learnt. (1) A four-month timescale for website redesign incorporating new content, and multi-audience feedback, could prove overly ambitious without a strong procurement team, dedicated staff, and established audience connections. (2) Content management systems may be a significantly limiting component, impacting both visual appeal and the audiences’ preferred access (e.g. mobile). Implementing certain recommendations (e.g. Data Use Register; Database register), can lead to potentially dense pages and visually cluttered tabular information that are difficult to navigate. (3) Publishing audit findings or information about breaches presents a communication challenge. The potential exists for misinterpretations of legal, technical, or classification terms, which could erode public trust, even with transparency as the aim. References[1] Macaulay, Y., UK Health Data Research Alliance, Pan-UK Data Governance Steering Group, HDR UK Public Advisory Board, & Five Safes Action Force. (2023). Pan-UK Data Governance Steering Group Data Access Transparency Standards. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8262453 [2] Information Commissioner’s Office (2024). Transparency in health and social care. Available at: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/data-protection-principles/transparency-in-health-and-social-care/ [3] O'Sullivan, K., Wilde, K. (2023). A profile of the Grampian Data Safe Haven, a regional Scottish safe haven for health and population data research. International Journal of Population Data Science, 4(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1817 [4] University of Aberdeen (2024). Grampian Data Safe Haven. Available at: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/research/digital-research/dash.php[5] Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W.,& Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. doi:10.1002/chp.47[6] Eccles, M.P., & Mittman, B.S. (2006). Welcome to Implementation Science. Implementation Science, 1(1) (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1[7] Matveeva, N., Moosally M., & Willerton, R. (2017). Plain Language in the Twenty-First Century: Introduction to the Special Issue on Plain Language. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 336-342. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2017.2759619[8] Page-Reeves, J., & Regino, L. (2018). Challenges and concrete, plain language strategies for community engagement in research. Anthropology in Action, 25(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2018.250202[9] University of Aberdeen (2024). Obtaining Permissions. Available at: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/research/digital-research/obtaining-permissions-1703.php [10] University of Aberdeen (2024). Project Process. Available at: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/research/digital-research/project-proccess-1702.php

Developing a new Governance Approval Process to support federated discovery and meta-analysis of data across the UK through the CO-CONNECT project.

A Hybrid Architecture (CO-CONNECT) to Facilitate Rapid Discovery and Access to Data Across the United Kingdom in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development Study

The COVID - Curated and Open aNalysis aNd rEsearCh plaTform (CO-CONNECT).

CO-CONNECT: A Hybrid Architecture to Facilitate Rapid Discovery and Access to UK Wide Data in the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)

Collaborating with patient and public members in developing the COVID - Curated and open analysis and research platform (CO-CONNECT).

Creating a Single Application and Approval Process to Enable Research; an example using CPRD Primary Care Data and Public Health England Cancer Registry Data

Establishing an ethics and governance framework for access to and linkage of electronic health data for research projects.

A Governance Framework to Integrate Longitudinal Clinical and Community Data in a Distributed Data Network: The Childhood Obesity Data Initiative

A governance framework for facilitating cross-agency data sharing

A holistic implementation of the Alliance Transparency Standards: Demystifying research governance and sensitive data processing

Participatory governance over research in an academic research network: the case of Diabetes Action Canada

Open Data governance at the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform (CONP): From the Walled Garden to the Arboretum

Abstract 3568: Managing large-scale cancer research data programs

Building a Governance Strategy for CER: The Patient Outcomes Research to Advance Learning (PORTAL) Network Experience

Dr.Aid: Supporting Data-governance Rule Compliance for Decentralized Collaboration in an Automated Way

The governance structure for data access in the DIRECT consortium: an innovative medicines initiative (IMI) project

Enabling data sharing and utilization for African population health data using OHDSI tools with an OMOP-common data model

Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment

Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks

Cloud-based biomedical data storage and analysis for genomic research: Landscape analysis of data governance in emerging NIH-supported platforms