Do professionalism, leadership, and resilience combine for professional identity formation? Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis
Aine Ryan,Catherine N Moran,David Byrne,Anne Hickey,Fiona Boland,Denis W Harkin,Shaista S Guraya,Abdelsalam Bensaaud,Frank Doyle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1385489
2024-06-13
Abstract:Introduction: Professional identity formation (PIF) is an ongoing, self-reflective process involving habits of thinking, feeling and acting like a physician and is an integral component of medical education. While qualitative work has suggested that PIF is informed by professionalism, resilience, and leadership, there is a dearth of quantitative work in this area. Multiple methods build rigor and the present study aimed to quantitatively assess the relative psychometric contributions of professionalism, resilience, and leadership constructs to informing PIF, using a latent factor analysis approach. Methods: We analyzed data from the PILLAR study, which is an online cross-sectional assessment of a pre-clinical cohort of medical students in the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, using established and validated quantitative measures in each area of interest: PIF, professionalism, leadership and resilience. A total of 76 items, combining four validated scales, along with a selection of demographic questions, were used. The hypothesis that PIF is informed by, and correlates with, professionalism, resilience and leadership was examined by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis of a proposed three-factor higher-order model. Model estimation used Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) with geomin rotation. The hypothesized (measurement) model was examined against an alternative (saturated) model, as well as a three-factor model. Results: Latent variable analysis from 1,311 students demonstrated that a three-factor higher-order model best fit the data; suggesting PIF is informed by professionalism, resilience, and leadership, and that these constructs are statistically distinct and account for differential aspects of PIF. This higher-order model of PIF outperformed both the saturated model and the three-factor model. The analysis of which component may be the most or least influential was inconclusive, and the overall model was not influenced by year of training. Discussion: Building upon existing conceptual contentions, our study is the first to quantitatively support the contribution of professionalism, resilience, and leadership to the development of professional identity, and to delineate the inter-relationships between PIF and these constructs. This information can be used by medical educators when designing curricula and educational strategies intended to enhance PIF. Future work should seek to assess the influence of these constructs longitudinally.