Abstract:Most of our knowledge about the neural networks mediating reading has derived from studies of developmental dyslexia (DD). For much of the 20th C. this was diagnosed on the basis of finding a discrepancy between children's unexpectedly low reading and spelling scores compared with their normal or high oral and non-verbal reasoning ability. This discrepancy criterion has now been replaced by the claim that the main feature of dyslexia is a phonological deficit, and it is now argued that we should test for this to identify dyslexia. However, grasping the phonological principle is essential for all learning to read; so every poor reader will show a phonological deficit. The phonological theory does not explain why dyslexic people, in particular, fail; so this phonological criterion makes it impossible to distinguish DD from any of the many other causes of reading failure. Currently therefore, there is no agreement about precisely how we should identify it. Yet, if we understood the specific neural pathways that underlie failure to acquire phonological skills specifically in people with dyslexia, we should be able to develop reliable means of identifying it. An important, though not the only, cause in people with dyslexia is impaired development of the brain's rapid visual temporal processing systems; these are required for sequencing the order of the letters in a word accurately. Such temporal, "transient," processing is carried out primarily by a distinct set of "magnocellular" (M-) neurones in the visual system; and the development of these has been found to be impaired in many people with dyslexia. Likewise, auditory sequencing of the sounds in a word is mediated by the auditory temporal processing system whose development is impaired in many dyslexics. Together these two deficits can therefore explain their problems with acquiring the phonological principle. Assessing poor readers' visual and auditory temporal processing skills should enable dyslexia to be reliably distinguished from other causes of reading failure and this will suggest principled ways of helping these children to learn to read, such as sensory training, yellow or blue filters or omega 3 fatty acid supplements. This will enable us to diagnose DD with confidence, and thus to develop educational plans targeted to exploit each individual child's strengths and compensate for his weaknesses.

Learning Alphabetic System Difficulties

The Science of Learning to Read Words: A Case for Systematic Phonics Instruction

Reading strategies in Spanish developmental dyslexics

Phonological syllables allow children with developmental dyslexia to access words

Reading Skills, Acquisition Of: Cultural, Environmental, and Developmental Impediments

Brain-Related Research as a Support Mechanism to Help Learners to Acquire Full Literacy

Auditory attention influences trajectories of symbol–speech sound learning in children with and without dyslexia

How psychological science informs the teaching of reading

English reading performance by Spanish speaking children: A phonologically or semantically mediated pathway?

Which Factors Modulate Letter Position Coding in Pre-literate Children?

The visual basis of reading and reading difficulties

Orthographic and Semantic Learning During Shared Reading: Investigating Relations to Early Word Reading

Neuroscience and Literacy: An Integrative View

Morphological processing influences on dyslexia in Greek-speaking children

Spelling errors by Spanish children when writing in English as a foreign language

Shaping the precision of letter position coding by varying properties of a writing system

Synthetic Phonics in Spanish Bilingual Education: Spelling Mistakes Analysis

The importance of correctly characterising the English spelling system when devising and evaluating methods of reading instruction: Comment on Taylor, Davis, and Rastle (2017)

The place of morphology in learning to read in English

Auditory Category Learning in Children With Dyslexia

Learning to read transforms phonological into phonographic representations: Evidence from a Mismatch Negativity study