Abstract:The article is of a generalizing nature; the authors investigate the problem associated with architectural design in the historical environment. The newly built civilian objects are considered as examples of the organic interaction between “old” and “new” in European cities. The authors’ positions of domestic and foreign professionals regarding the development of the potential of the historical centres of modern cities are considered. In connection with the dynamics of urban growth in the XXI century, the problem of renewal and development of historically established centers arises. Development as a modernization of the historical environment assumes a high-quality level of integration of relevant functions in the unique conditions of authentic urban structures. The cultural aspect of the problem is to solve the main problem of the historical environment -the preservation and protection of the valuable architectural and urban planning heritage. The authors highlight the need for an integrated approach to theproblem and formulation of a development strategy. The experience of Odessa shows the negative results of delay in such matters. Urban space as a living organism presupposes a progressive process of regeneration of both the urban structure and the “tissue” of the city, filling the space and being subordinated to the structure. A scientific approach presupposes discussion, variability and flexibility concerning the protection and development of the historical environment. However, taking into account the whole complex of economic, administrative, and cultural conditions, we can say about two main approaches in relation to the historical architectural environment in Ukraine. One is based on a conservative approach and denies the objects of modern architecture in the historical environment. This approach assumes that a historically formed urban planning formation is an integral urban planning phenomenon and only allows the construction of new objects in historical styles, allows the priority task of restoration and reconstruction of existing objects. Another approach is based on a dialectical approach and allows the introduction into the historical tissue of the city of new objects that meet all progressive achievements of engineering and technology, have modern and current features of the style (stylistic direction). At the same time, an important aspect is the novelty and high aesthetic level of architecture, due to the requirements of modern society. The logic of this approach comes from the very essence ofarchitecture, placed in the classic triad of benefit, strength and beauty. The most important factor that determines the value of the historical core of the city, in particular, the historical centre of Odessa, is the integrity of the historical structure, the interaction of all elements of the architectural complex, and a balanced urban infrastructure. At the same time, the architectural complex consists of objects of different value categories. Some are historical and architectural monuments of the universal, state and local importance. Others are authentic objects of “back-ground” development that contribute to the integrity of the city’s historical tissue. This is the picture that shows a historical accuracy. According to the authors, the scale for determining the objective value of each architectural object in this case is of a relative nature and, to a large extent, in our time is not the primary task of preserving the architectural heritage. The task of an integrated approach to the problem and elaboration of a preservation strategy is a priority task. In recent years, intensive construction has taken place on local fragments of the historical part of the city, which leads to the final destruction of the historical city. In many cases, modern civil engineering works are monotonous and have doubtful cultural qualities, and at the technical level they exacerbate the situation of collapse at the infrastructural level. There is an international, in particular, European experience in solving the problem of the conflict between new and historical in the cities of Germany, Poland, Spain, etc. The destructive cataclysms of the XX century caused great losses to the architectural heritage. The world community has developed norms and rules that allow for a huge number of implementation options in the context of regional features. The problem of a new construction in the historical environment today is not about the question of whether the object is stylized or modernized. The problem is to determine the principles of interaction of the historical environment with new structures, in the degree of “civility” of a new architecture, the ability of the “new” to further develop the potential of urban space.

MANOR OF THE SOCIETY FOR EMERGENCY MEDICINE IN KYIV. HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE AND SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE CITY

TO THE HISTORY AND ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING AT 14 DOROSHENKA STREET IN LVIV

Formation of the architectural space of health care facilities based on landscape design

Sustainable Development in the Context of the Architecture of Environmental Friendly Medical Centers in Rural Areas (Case for Ukraine)

MODERN ARCHITECTURE IN HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT(CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES)

Digitalization of Historical Monuments in the Context of Architecture and Urban Planning: Creating Virtual Museums and Platforms

FORMATION AND MODERN DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL CULTURAL HERITAGE IN UKRAINE

ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE PHENOMENON

«FIRST DOCTOR'S HOUSE»  HISTORICAL DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE OF DESIGNING AN APARTMENT HOUSE FOR RESIDENCE AND WORK OF DOCTORS

THE CONCEPT OF PRESERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE CITY OF ODESA

SAVING UKRAINIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE DURING THE WAR: PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS

HOUSEHOLD BUILDING (LATE 17TH–19TH CENTURY, RYAZAN KREMLIN) RESTORATION AND ADAPTATION TO MODERN USE

Restoration of Monumental Painting in Ukraine in the 1950–1960s. Social Aspirations and Ideological Collisions

CONCEPTUAL CONFLICT BETWEEN THE FOUNDERS OF THE PEREYASLAV SKANSEN REGARDING ITS NAME AND THEMATIC STRUCTURE (IN THE LATE 1950es AND 1960es)

Modern requirements for energy-efficient renovation of historical buildings

Archaeological Antiquities of Church and Archaeological Museum at Kyiv Theological Academy (1872-1919)

Study of the protection of the architectural heritage of Russia

MODERN PROBLEMS OF ESTABLISHMENT OF REHABILITATION CENTERS. RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW AND EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES

PATTERNS OF THE FORMATION OF RURAL PUBLIC BUILDING IN MODERN CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT

THE MAIN TRENDS AND DIRECTIONS OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND REGENERATION OF THE HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENT

Assessment of the national significance «Skala-Podilsky park» park-memories and landscaping art green plantations conditions