Th1 and Th17 cells are critical for limiting the severity of Staphylococcus aureus craniotomy infection

Gunjan Kak,Christopher M. Horn,Cortney E. Heim,Tammy Kielian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.208.supp.56.15
2022-05-01
The Journal of Immunology
Abstract:Abstract A craniotomy is performed to access the brain for tumor resection, localization and resection of epileptogenic foci, and aneurysm clipping. Despite prophylaxis, infectious complications after craniotomy range from 1–3%, with approximately half caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which forms a biofilm on the bone flap that is recalcitrant to antibiotics. Using our novel mouse model of S. aureus craniotomy infection, Th1 and Th17 infiltrates were found to preferentially home to the brain but not the subcutaneous galea; however, their functional importance is unknown. RAG1 knockout (KO) mice displayed significant increases in bacterial burden in the brain, galea, and bone flap at days 3, 7, and 14 post-infection, which was negated following the adoptive transfer of either in vitro skewed Th1 or Th17 cells. Interestingly, in vitro skewed Th17 cells acquired Th1 characteristics upon migrating into the brain in vivo as revealed by the production of Th1-associated cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α with minimal IL-17A. We established that the window of T cell protection was during acute infection, since delaying Th1 or Th17 adoptive transfer until day 7 post-infection was no longer able to attenuate S. aureus burden in RAG1 KO mice compared to T cell transfers at day −1 or 3 after infection that were effective. In vitro studies established that both Th1 and Th17 cells augmented microglial, macrophage, and neutrophil S. aureus bactericidal activity and IL-12p70 and CXCL10 production. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of an early adaptive immune response for bacterial containment during S. aureus craniotomy infection by promoting the antimicrobial activity of infiltrating leukocytes and resident microglia.
immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?