Abstract:Abstract. The consequences of climate change, nature loss, and other changes to the Earth system will impact societies' ability to tackle the causes of these problems. There are extensive agendas of study and action on the risks resulting from changes in the Earth system. These consider the failure to realise rapid sustainability transitions to date (“physical risk”) and the risks resulting from these transitions going forward (“transition risk”). Yet there is no established agenda on the risks to sustainability transitions from both physical and transition risks and their knock-on consequences. In response, we develop a conceptual socio-ecological systems model that explores how the escalating consequences of changes in the Earth system impacts the ability of societies to undertake work on environmental action that, in turn, re-stabilises natural systems. On one hand, these consequences can spur processes of political, economic, and social change that could accelerate the growth in work done, as societies respond constructively to tackle the causes of a less stable world. Conversely, escalating demands to manage increasingly chaotic conditions could divert work and political support from environmental action, deepening changes in the Earth system. If the latter dynamic dominates over the former, the chance is increased of passing a planetary threshold over which human agency to re-stabilise the natural world is severely impaired. We term this “derailment risk”: the risk that the journey to bring the world back into a safe operating space is derailed by interacting biophysical and socio-economic factors. We use a case study of a climate tipping element – the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – to illustrate derailment risk. A range of policy responses can identify and mitigate derailment risk, including transformational adaptation. Acting on derailment risk is a critical requirement for accelerating the re-stabilisation of Earth system elements and avoiding catastrophic outcomes.

Bridging as Metaphor- A Systems Thinking Approach for Exploring Transboundary Risk

Rising to a New Challenge: A Protocol for Case-Study Research on Transboundary Climate Risk

Bridge-specific flood risk assessment of transport networks using GIS and remotely sensed data

Scenarios—using the complexity frame of reference to inform the construction of available futures in the possibility space

Toward Systemic Thinking in Managing Environmental Risks

Telecoupled systems are rewired by risks

Bridge and Transport Network Resilience – a Perspective

A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science

Framing Ecosystem Services in the Telecoupled Anthropocene

Risk Society and Science Education

Dr aft Network-based Assessment of Resilience of Road Systems

Managing systemic risk in emergency management, organizational resilience and climate change adaptation

Risk, Reward, and Resilience Framework: Integrative Policy Making in a Complex World

Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition

Bridging the gap between supply chain risk management and strategic technology partnering capabilities: insights from social capital theory

Democratising Risk: In Search of a Methodology to Study Existential Risk

Conceptualizing World-Earth System resilience: Exploring transformation pathways towards a safe and just operating space for humanity

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Cybersecurity: A Framework for Encouraging Transdisciplinary Thinking

Lessons from COVID-19 for managing transboundary climate risks and building resilience

Risk-informed asset management to tackle scouring on bridges across transport networks

A modeling framework for World-Earth System resilience: Exploring social inequality and earth system tipping points