1092 CATHETER ABLATION VERSUS MEDICAL THERAPY OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Michele Magnocavallo,Antonio Parlavecchio,Giampaolo Vetta,Carola Gianni,Marco Polselli,Francesco De Vuono,Luigi Pannone,Sanghamitra Mohanty,Fillippo Maria Cauti,Rodolfo Caminiti,Vincenzo Miraglia,Cinzia Monaco,Gian Battista Chierchia,Pietro Rossi,Luigi Di Biase,Stefano Bianchi,Carlo De Asmundis,Andrea Natale,Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac121.094
2022-12-14
European Heart Journal Supplements
Abstract:Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist and syner-gistically contribute to an increased risk of hospitalization, stroke, and mortality. Objective: To compare the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) versus medical therapy (MT) in HF patients with AF. Methods Electronic databases were queried for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CA versus MT of AF in patients with HF. Risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence in-tervals (CIs) were measured using the Mantel–Haenszel method. Results A total of nine RCTs enrolling 2155 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to MT, CA led to a significant reduction in the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (24.6% vs. 37.1%; RR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53–0.80); p < 0.0001) (Figure 1), all-cause mortality (8.8% vs. 13.6%; RR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.51–0.82); p = 0.0005), HF hospitalization (15.4% vs. 22.4%; (RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54–0.82); p = 0.0001), AF re-currence (31.8% vs. 77.0%; RR: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.24–0.54); p < 0.0001), and cardiovascular (CV) death (4.9% vs. 8.4%; RR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.39–0.86); p = 0.007). CA improved the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD:4.76% (95% CI: 2.35–7.18); p = 0.0001), 6 min walk test (MD: 20.48 m (95% CI: 10.83–30.14); p < 0.0001), peak oxygen consumption (MD: 3.1 2mL/kg/min (95% CI: 1.01–5.22); p = 0.004), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MD: −6.98 (95% CI: −12–03, −1.93); p = 0.007), and brain natriuretic peptide levels (MD:−133.94 pg/mL (95% CI: −197.33, −70.55); p < 0.0001). Conclusions In HF patients, AF catheter ablation was superior to MT in re-ducing CV and all-cause mortality. Further significant benefits occurred within the ablation group in terms of HF hospitalizations, AF recurrences, the systolic function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Figure 1: Forest plot displaying a decrease in the composite endpoint in patients with AF and HF undergoing CA versus MT.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?