Abstract:Today, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is accelerating with the development of ICT and AI, and people are enjoying benefits such as “biological human enhancement” through various advanced technologies. However, there are also concerns that the advancement of science and technology may shrink the realm of human creativity. This study explores the possibilities and limitations of AI's ability to create literary art. Since the first AI-authored literary attempt in 1984, AI's ability to create literature has improved by leaps and bounds with the introduction of deep learning. GPT-3, in particular, has learned far more text and 175 billion parameters than its predecessors, resulting in a remarkable linguistic ability. GPT-3 can produce text that is virtually indistinguishable from human writing, and some researchers describe it as creative, witty, deep, and beautiful. However, there are questions about GPT-3's capabilities. GPT-3 is limited to generating text based on existing works, does not form a coherent narrative, and requires guidance from a human user. It has also been criticized that GPT-3 plays a “probability game,” choosing words based on statistical probabilities, which is inherently different from human creation. Nevertheless, GPT-3's creations often contain compelling and eye-catching parts. In the creation of literary works, novelty is divided into novelty in the “story” and novelty in the “telling” of the story. A story requires a “fictional world” that includes characters and events, and to create a finished story is to create a fictional world. The narrative technique or style is telling, which refers to the author's distinctive style. It is still useful to examine whether AI can reach each stage. While AI may be able to imitate some forms, the question remains whether its output will have lasting and unique formal characteristics. The technology for creating AI poetry involves entering keywords based on a language model, extracting.

Post-Automation Poetics, or How Cold-War Computers Discovered Poetry

The Poetry of Prompts: The Collaborative Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Creation of Poetry and the Anxiety of Machine Influence

Shall I Compare Thee to a Machine-Written Sonnet? An Approach to Algorithmic Sonnet Generation

A study of the possibilities and limitations of artificial intelligence literature

Romantic-Computing

I, Poet: Automatic Poetry Composition Through Recurrent Neural Networks with Iterative Polishing Schema

Can AI Write Classical Chinese Poetry like Humans? An Empirical Study Inspired by Turing Test

Introducing Aspects of Creativity in Automatic Poetry Generation

Does ChatGPT Have a Poetic Style?

From Textual Experiments to Experimental Texts: Expressive Repetition in "Artificial Intelligence Literature"

Computer-Generated Fiction in a Literary Lineage

Understanding Literary Texts by LLMs: A Case Study of Ancient Chinese Poetry

The Work of Art in the Age of AI Image Generation

No Ideas but in Technology: William Carlos Williams, Concepts of the New, and Electronic Literature

There Once Was a Really Bad Poet, It Was Automated but You Didn't Know It

"Between the Lines": Perceptions of Poetry With Authorship Attributed to Artificial Intelligence or Humans – A Comparative Analysis

Creative Data Generation: A Review Focusing on Text and Poetry

Chinese Poetry Generation with a Working Memory Model

Composing Like an Ancient Chinese Poet: Learn to Generate Rhythmic Chinese Poetry

Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry