A Novel Device for Simultaneous Dentoalveolar and Zygomatic Distraction Osteogenesis to Reconstruct Maxillectomy: A Preliminary in Vitro Study
Zhihong Feng,Yan Dong,Yunpeng Bi,Bo Wang,Yimin Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31821ef2d5
2011-01-01
Abstract:Sir: Distraction osteogenesis has been used extensively to treat patients with craniofacial deformities in recent years.1–3 However, no article has reported a method with which to design a bidirectional curvilinear device for simultaneous dentoalveolar and zygomatic distraction osteogenesis for reconstructive maxillectomy. The purpose of this communication is to demonstrate a novel device to resolve the above problem. A three-dimensional model of the human craniofacial skeleton with unilateral maxillectomy was constructed with computed tomographic data using the software program Mimics 12.0. Then, the “normal” structure of maxillectomy was reconstructed by mirror projection to obtain an intact three-dimensional model, which was used to design the curvilinear personalized distractor by using Pro Engineer 4.0. First, the distractor “rail a” (for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis) and “rail b” (for zygomatic distraction osteogenesis) were designed. The two rails were both square-bodied with a 2.5 × 2.5-mm cross-section, and a groove was created on the convex surface of each rail to house a traction cable. Rail a was set approximately 5 mm apically from the gingival margin and 2 mm from bone surface based on mirrored maxilla, which was basically oriented parallel to the maxillary alveolar ridge. Rail b was located between the zygoma and the first molar position of rail a in the defect side. The traction cable in rail b could go into the groove of rail a through a hole. Second, four stabilizers were established. Each stabilizer included three screw holes in triangular arrangement for 2.0-mm diameter titanium screw. Stabilizers a and b were fitted on the end of rails a and b used to fix the device. Stabilizers c and d were fitted onto the predicted bone transport disk. Third, two transport plates (transport plates a and b) were built according to rail, which were fitted onto the two rails and, respectively, connected to stabilizers c and d. The three-dimensional distractor was finished, except for the activation mechanism that had been manufactured ahead of schedule. The finished three-dimensional distractor was transferred onto the three-dimensional human craniofacial skeleton model with unilateral maxillectomy to perform an animation of osteotomy to develop the bone transport disk and distraction process (Fig. 1).Fig. 1.: The finished three-dimensional distraction device except for the distraction mechanism. The virtual simulation experiment was used to develop the bone transport disk and the whole distraction process. It showed that the designed personalized combined distraction device could simultaneously develop dentoalveolar and zygomatic distraction osteogenesis, and the dentoalveolar and zygomatic transport disks could contact each other at the end of the distraction process.Then, it was processed into a medical grade titanium distraction device. The activation mechanism was connected to rail a through two bolts. There were two activation rods (activation rods a and b) in the traction mechanism, which were connected to transport plates a and b, respectively, with the traction cable (a medical grade nickel-titanium alloy wire with a 0.5-mm diameter) in the grooves on the convex surface of the two rails. Turning the activation rod, the cable would be wound around the rod and the transport plate with the bone transport disk would slide along the rail. A minimum turn causes a 0.5-mm slide (Fig. 2). The distraction device was installed onto the solid model and the whole distraction process was simulated. At the end of the distraction process, the dentoalveolar and zygomatic transport disks had contacted each other. This phenomenon meant that it was completely possible to functionally reconstruct unilateral maxillectomy with the novel device.Fig. 2.: The finished medical grade titanium distractor device. The distractor rail a was for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis and rail b was for zygomatic distraction osteogenesis. Stabilizers a and b were fitted onto the end of rails a and b used to fix the device. Stabilizers c and d were fitted onto the predicted bone transport disk. Transport plates a and b were built according to rail, which were fitted onto the two rails and connected to stabilizers c and d, respectively. The traction cable in rail b could go into the groove of rail a through a hole; thus, there will be only one incision for rail a to go through a patient's cheek.Zhi-hong Feng, D.D.S., Ph.D. Yan Dong, D.D.S., Ph.D. Yun-peng Bi, D.D.S., Ph.D. Bo Wang, M.D.S. Yi-min Zhao, D.D.S., Ph.D. Department of Prosthodontics School of Stomatology Fourth Military Medical University Shaanxi, People's Republic of China ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by a grant from the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (project no. 2007BAI18B05).