Abstract:The subject of research is the study of mediation procedure and embedding of mediation techniques in such a specific area of relations, the participants of which are the tax authority and the taxpayer. The settlement of tax disputes is quite understandable, since this mechanism allows to keep an economic entity on the market, on the one hand, and to replenish the state budget on the other. The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that the current mechanism of pre-trial settlement of disputes established in the Russian Tax Code does not correspond to the techniques of the mediation process. The methodological basis of the research was formed by general scientific methods of cognition, which include the principles of objectivity and system analysis of the information collected during preparation of the publication. At the same time private scientific methods were also used in the work, including descriptive and comparative legal methods, which made it possible to use the practices of foreign states in terms of the use of mediation procedures. The author analyzes the official data published by the tax authority, regarding the number of disputes considered over the period of the past three years. The main scientific results , scope of application. The study made it possible to gain new knowledge in the field of legal regulation of mediation. The presented foreign experience demonstrates that at present Russia is only at the stage of formation of mediation. Most people do not yet understand what exactly the advantages of mediation. The existing procedure for the judicial settlement of a dispute attracts its participants due to the fact that the current state fees are very low compared to their foreign counterparts. All kinds of legislative transformations lead to an ambiguous interpretation of legal norms, which often defy literal interpretation, followed by conflicts in law enforcement. Since the practice of using mediation sessions is not widespread at present, a large number of debatable questions arise about the procedure for conducting mediation, the possibility of fiscal body participation, determining the categories of disputes in which negotiation techniques can be applied. Conclusions . Mediation is a systemic process that allows constructive negotiations between the parties involved in the dispute in order to resolve the problem and possibly reach an agreement on the settlement of the dispute. At the same time, it is emphasized that the lack of law enforcement practice complicates the process of researching the institution of tax mediation. The role of a mediator in legal relations (with the tax authority as a participant) is a person who must create a constructive atmosphere for discussing the conflict; adhere to the principles of mediation; assist in finding solutions without expressing his opinion on the agenda. This role of mediator is not adequately reflected in the legislation in relation to tax disputes.

TO THE QUESTION OF PRE-JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF TAX DISPUTES

Mediation as an alternative form of pre-trial settlement of a tax dispute: doctrinal approaches and law enforcement practice

Tax Mediation as a Tools for Resolving Tax Disputes

Taxation of Digital Companies: Experience of Russia and Other CountriesLegal Regulation of Non-Judicial Methods of Consideration and Resolution of Tax Disputes: Tax Ombudsman, Tax Arbitration and Mediation in Tax Disputes

The Legal Nature of Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in the Civil Procedure

TAX TREATY ARBITRATION

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

Mutual Agreement Procedures within the Framework of Tax Monitoring as an Alternative Dispute Settlement Type

ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION OF TAX DISPUTES

Tax Treaty Dispute Resolution Procedures

Legal grounds for implementing the institution of recourse to the mediation procedure and the use of other alternative methods of resolving tax and customs disputes

Mandatory Pre-trial Procedure for the Settlement of Disputes in Civil Procedure (Analysis of the Application of Part 5 of Article 4 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation)

ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF TAX CONSULTING IN ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION OF TAX DISPUTES

The potentials and limitations of tax dispute prevention and alternative resolution mechanisms

CERTAIN ASPECTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE FIELD OF RESOLVING TAX DISPUTES

International development of the concept of taxation of a permanent representation of a foreign company as an “independent taxpayer” and the experience of its application in the Russian Federation

Tax information acquired from foreign jurisdictions in the practice of arbitration courts of the Russian Federation

JUDICIAL PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF TAX LAW

SHAPING THE FUTURE OF TRANSNATIONAL TAX DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

MODERN PROBLEMS OF TAXATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES OF TAX REGULATION

THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRE-TRIAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE IN RUSSIA