Abstract:We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis.Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients.Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology.Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis. Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients. Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology. Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage IA Lung AdenocarcinomaThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 98Issue 1PreviewSystematic lymph node dissection or sampling in all patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma is currently controversial because the risk of lymph node metastasis is unclear. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Full-Text PDF

Factors Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis in Special Types of Invasive Breast Cancer at National Cancer Hospital in the Period of 2018 - 2021

Incidence and Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Neoadjuvant Therapy: Analysis of SEER Data.

High Risk For Non-Sentinel Node Metastasis In Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Node Metastases

Correlation Analysis of Pathological Features and Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and the Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Microinvasion: a Population-Based Study.

Relationship between molecular typing and axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with different T stages and its clinical significance

Predictive Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Small Size Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Analysis on related factors of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer

A Risk Model Based on Ultrasound, Ultrasound Elastography, and Histologic Parameters for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Optimal Lung Cancer Candidates for Sublobar Resection: Prediction of Pathologic Node-Negative Clinical Stage IA NSCLC.

High risk factors of intramammary lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer patients received extended radical mastectomy:an analysis of 1679 cases

Predictive Factors for Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in the Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Two or Fewer Nodes in Breast Cancer

Clinicopathological Risk Factors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Vietnamese Women with Primary Invasive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Possible Selective Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Risk Factors Of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis In Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node

The Levels of Ki-67 Positive Are Positively Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer

Abstract P3-01-13: Risk Factors of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node

Incidence of Pathologic Nodal Disease in Clinically Node-Negative, Microinvasive or T1a Breast Cancers

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer patients following primary radical hysterectomy: A single-center analysis of 1495 patients.

Histological scoring of immune and stromal features in breast and axillary lymph nodes is prognostic for distant metastasis in lymph node-positive breast cancers.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Thoracic Cavity of Squamous Cell Lung Cancer and Adenocarcinoma