Abstract:IMPORTANCE Multiple paclitaxel-based regimens are widely used in chemoradiation therapy against esophageal cancer, including regimens combining paclitaxel with fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin. However, which among these 3 regimens provides the best prognosis with minimum adverse events is still unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and adverse events of fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin in definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial of patients with ESCC was conducted in 11 treatment centers in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years and had histologically confirmed ESCC stages Ila to IVa with no prior treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, and adequate organ functions. The study was conducted between July 2015 and February 2018, and the cutoff date for data analysis was August 31, 2020. INTERVENTIONS Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups combining paclitaxel treatment with fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin. Patients in the cisplatin group were treated with 2 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cydes of consolidation chemotherapy with monthly paclitaxel plus cisplatin. For the fluorouracil group, patients were administered 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in consolidation chemotherapy. Patients in the carboplatin group were treated with 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in consolidation chemotherapy. All patients received radiotherapy of 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were progression-free survival and adverse events. RESULTS Overall, 321 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 years [59-69 years); 248 [77.3%] men) with ESCC from 11 centers were randomized into fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin groups between July 2015 and February 2018. Over a median (IQR) follow-up time of surviving patients of 46.0 months (36.6-53.0 months), the 3-year OS rates were 57.2% in the fluorouracil group, 60.1% in the cisplatin group, and 56.5% in the carboplatin group, respectively (fluorouracil vs cisplatin: HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.71-1.60; P = .77; fluorouracil vs carboplatin: HR. 0.94; 95% Cl. 0.63-1.40; P = .77). The cisplatin group had significantly higher incidences of acute grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (69 events [60.8%] vs 19 [17.8%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] carboplatin; P < .001), thrombocytopenia (14 events [13.1%] vs 4 [3.7%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P = .01), anemia (50 events above grade 2 [46.7%] vs 25 [23.4%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] for carboplatin; P = .35), fatigue (11 events (10.3%] vs 2 [1.9%] for fluorouracil and 1 [0.9%] carboplatin; P = .007), and vomiting (17 events above grade 2 [15.9%] vs 3 [2.8%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P < .001) than the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, paclitaxel plus fluorouracil did not show OS superiority over paclitaxel plus cisplatin or paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Higher rates of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxic effects were reported in the cisplatin group compared with those in the fluorouracil or carboplatin groups.

377. NEOADJUVANT CARBOPLATIN/PACLITAXEL VERSUS 5-FLUOROURACIL/CISPLATIN IN COMBINATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: A MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE STUDY

Phase III Randomized Study of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A Randomized Phase II/III Study of Paclitaxel/cisplatin Versus Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) Followed by Surgery for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC).

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is superior to cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using retrospective, real‐world evidence

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asia: a systematic review

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

Preoperative Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer with 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel: Treatment Practice over a 20-Year Period and Implications for the Individual Treatment Modalities

Comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

X versus XELOX versus PF in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) for local-advanced squamous esophageal cancer (ESCC): 2021 update from a multicenter, open-label, randomized III trial, CRTCOESC trial.

Final Results of a Phase 3 Study of Comparing Paclitaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus 5-Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma (Eso-Shanghai 1).

Final Results of a Phase 3 Study of Comparing Paclitaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus 5-Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China

Concurrent Cisplatin And 5-Fluorouracil Versus Concurrent Cisplatin And Docetaxel With Radiotherapy For Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Prospective Randomized Phase 2 Study of Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy (CCRT) Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage IV Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)

Comparison of 3 Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer A Randomized Clinical Trial

Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials

Neo-AEGIS (Neoadjuvant trial in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophago-Gastric Junction International Study): Preliminary results of phase III RCT of CROSS versus perioperative chemotherapy (Modified MAGIC or FLOT protocol). (NCT01726452).

Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Chemoradiotherapy as Definitive or Pre-Operative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer

Comparison of Cisplatinum/paclitaxel with Cisplatinum/5-Fluorouracil As First-Line Therapy for Nonsurgical Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Age Plays an Important Role in the Decision of Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC): a Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Multicenter Data (3JECROG R-02A)