Abstract:Discussions about unilateral trade measures as a means to combat climate change have become quite fashionable notwithstanding warnings against unilateralism and protectionism from the leaders of G-8 and G-20 in times of an economic crisis. A system of ‘border tax adjustment’ on imports is suggested in order to countervail the cost of domestic emission trading systems. The proponents argue that without such measures, a country having adopted an emission trading system would not only lose economically but also environmentally. The standard reason given to justify this argument is the notion of carbon leakage, namely, the danger that energy-intensive production would move from countries with domestic policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions based on a carbon price for emitters to regions that do not have a binding and costly regulatory CO2 regime. Recently, the discussions have been fuelled by the Waxman/Markey Bill, adopted on 26 June 2009 by the House of Representatives and by a French non-paper, presented at the informal EU Environment Council held in July 2009. These two initiatives aim to establish, in the context of a domestic emission trading system, a system of ‘border tax adjustment’ against some imports from some countries, namely, those that are seen as not contributing enough in the fight against climate change. The revised European ETS Directive does not provide for border measures. It instructs the European Commission to submit a report to the Council and the European Parliament no later than 30 June 2010 assessing whether energy-intensive sectors are exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage and explicitly outlines the inclusion of imports in the European Union’s ETS system as one of several actions. The joint WTO-UNEP paper on trade and climate change has been widely regarded as a justification from a legal point of view of such measures. While there are many proponents for such measures, there remains a considerable amount of skepticism; politicians, business organizations, and scholars have warned against such an approach. The following short note will discuss the feasibility of ‘border tax adjustment’ in relation to domestic climate change legislation as well as some WTO legal aspects along the following questions: (1) Are there target countries for border measures? (2) Would border measures help to combat climate change and could they be administered without too much bureaucracy? (3) How should border measures be qualified under General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)?

Current and future protection against carbon leakage in the European Emissions Trading System

EU in Search of a Wto-Compatible Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

The economics of carbon leakage mitigation policies

Does the Risk of Carbon Leakage Justify the CBAM?

EU carbon border adjustments for imported products and WTO law

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is Inefficient in Addressing Carbon Leakage and Results in Unfair Welfare Losses

Assessing different European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners

Carbon Leakage in a European Power System with Inhomogeneous Carbon Prices

From theory to practice: determining emissions in traded goods under a border carbon adjustment

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to Tackle Carbon Leakage in the International Fertilizer Trade

Carbon border adjustment mechanism in the transition to net-zero emissions: collective implementation and distributional impacts

Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade

The Economics of Border Carbon Adjustment: Rationale and Impacts of Compensating for Carbon at the Border

Border Tax Adjustment to Combat Carbon Leakage: A Myth

Research on the Inhibitory Effect of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Carbon Leakage

Could the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism promote climate mitigation? An economy-wide analysis

Implementing the EU Climate Law via the ‘Fit for 55’ package

Export Rebates and the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: WTO Law and Environmental Objections

Emissions trading system: bridging the gap between environmental targets and fair competition

Trade and Climate Change: Focus on Carbon Leakage, Border Carbon Adjustments and WTO Consistency

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – A Tax in Disguise?