Abstract:Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates the development of hearing ability and shows that there is a significant improvement in some cognitive parameters related to selective visual/spatial attention and to fluid or multisensory reasoning, in children fitted with auditory brainstem implantation (ABI). The improvement in cognitive paramenters is due to several factors, among which there is certainly, as demonstrated in the literature on a cochlear implants (CIs), the activation of the auditory sensory canal, which was previously absent. The findings of the present study indicate that children with cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities with associated cognitive deficits should not be excluded from ABI implantation. Objectives: The indications for ABI have been extended over the last 10 years to adults with non-tumoral (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities that cannot benefit from CI. We demonstrated that the ABI with surface electrodes may provide sufficient stimulation of the central auditory system in adults for open set speech recognition. These favourable results motivated us to extend ABI indications to children with profound hearing loss who were not candidates for a CI. This study investigated the performances of young deaf children undergoing ABI, in terms of their auditory perceptual development and their non-verbal cognitive abilities. Patients and methods: In our department from 2000 to 2006, 24 children aged 14 months to 16 years received an ABI for different tumour and non-tumour diseases. Two children had NF2 tumours. Eighteen children had bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia. In this group, nine children had associated cochlear malformations, two had unilateral facial nerve agenesia and two had combined microtia, aural atresia and middle ear malformations. Four of these children had previously been fitted elsewhere with a CI with no auditory results. One child had bilateral incomplete cochlear partition (type II); one child, who had previously been fitted unsuccessfully elsewhere with a CI, had auditory neuropathy; one child showed total cochlear ossification bilaterally due to meningitis; and one child had profound hearing loss with cochlear fractures after a head injury. Twelve of these children had multiple associated psychomotor handicaps. The retrosigmoid approach was used in all children. Intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) and postoperative EABRs and electrical middle latency responses (EMLRs) were performed. Perceptual auditory abilities were evaluated with the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) battery - the Listening Progress Profile (LIP), the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) - and the Category of Auditory Performance (CAP). Cognitive evaluation was performed on seven children using the Leiter International Performance Scale - Revised (LIPS-R) test with the following subtests: Figure ground, Form completion, Sequential order and Repeated pattern. Results: No postoperative complications were observed. All children consistently used their devices for >75% of waking hours and had environmental sound awareness and utterance of words and simple sentences. Their CAP scores ranged from 1 to 7 (average =4); with MAIS they scored 2-97.5% (average =38%); MUSS scores ranged from 5 to 100% (average =49%) and LIP scores from 5 to 100% (average =45%). Owing to associated disabilities, 12 children were given other therapies (e.g. physical therapy and counselling) in addition to speech and aural rehabilitation therapy. Scores for two of the four subtests of LIPS-R in this study increased significantly during the first year of auditory brainstem implant use in all seven children selected for cognitive evaluation.

Development of children's auditory skills in the first year after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant

The Development of Auditory Skills in Young Children with Mondini Dysplasia after Cochlear Implantation

Early prelingual auditory and language development in children with simultaneous bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants

Effects of Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Evidence from Speech-Evoked Cortical Potentials and Tests of Speech Perception

Simultaneous versus sequential bilateral implantation in young children: Effects on central auditory system development and plasticity

Auditory Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss

[Auditory Development in 1－5 Years Prelingual Hearing Loss Children after Cochlear Implantation].

Cochlear Implantation in Young Mandarin-Speaking Children: One Year After First Fitting

The Development of Lateralization Abilities in Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants

Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Very Young Children Improves Adaptability and Social Skills: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Objective Electroencephalography-Based Assessment for Auditory Rehabilitation of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users

Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: long-term speech perception results in children first implanted at an early age

The Auditory Rehabilitation Outcomes of Children with Cochlear Implants

[Effects of Bimodal Intervention on the Development of Auditory and Speech Ability in Infants with Unilateral Cochlear Implantation].

Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children

Timing of Cochlear Implantation and Parents’ Global Ratings of Children’s Health and Development

Relationships Between Bilateral Auditory Brainstem Activity and Inter-Implant Interval in Children with Cochlear Implants.

The Assessment of Auditory Abilities of Prelingually Hearing-impaired Patients after Cochlear Implantation

Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children?

Language, cognitive, and speech in noise perception abilities of children with cochlear ımplants: a comparative analysis by implantation period and bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants

The Infulence of Factors on Auditory and Speech Performances in Preschool Children with Unilateral Cochlear Implantation