Abstract:Mandatory and restrictive health regulations during the corona pandemic caused psychic disorders in many people, which even led to clinically relevant mental disorders. At the same time, there was gradually a polarization of opinions among the population. In order to improve future pandemic management, an integrative understanding of these psychosocial processes therefore seems useful. Here we start theoretically with the mental effects of inconsistencies of the information environment by referring to concepts such as the theory of cognitive dissonance. In a next step, we use the psychodynamic theory to understand the affective-motivational defense mechanisms underlying these cognitive states and processes. However, a broader theoretical framework of psychoanalysis seems to make sense, because self-referential processing also influences the style of thinking. For this reason, we use a more comprehensive psychological systems theoretical framework model to integrate these different perspectives. This integrative view refers in part to basic knowledge of health psychology regarding the resistance of unhealthy ways of thinking and behaviors and the possibilities for interventions for change. We then extend this model to a broader picture that also covers the relationship between men and their environment. This results in the perspective of a multidimensional socioecological theoretical framework, which as a heuristic reference model and related to other ecological approaches could also be helpful for various theoretical questions for public health, and could provide a better public understanding of health issues. In line with this perspective, we hypothesize that with regard to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the acceptance of public health narratives could be increased if a more consistent picture of the scientific descriptions and explanations of the pandemic - similar to the model proposed - could be provided, which would enable the understanding of the origin, course and countermeasures, and thus could have positive collective psycho-hygienic effects.

There is no inside/outside: on the entanglement of bodily self and biosocial environment as a basis for connectedness and compassion in times of COVID-19

Reaching Up, Down, In, and Around: Couple and Family Coping During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Alone within the ALONESS of Covid-19: Developing Contemplative, Artistic Inner Friendship for Turbulent Times

Psychoanalysis in the time of coronavirus: From an onboard logbook during the pandemic

Reflection and resilience in counselling

The Analyst's Self-Care: Further Reflections after the Pandemic on Cultivating Resilience and the Essential Role of the Body-Mind Relationship in Clinical Practice

Letting Go of Familiar Narratives as Tragic Optimism in the Era of COVID-19

Psychoanalysis during the COVID-19 pandemic: Several reflections on countertransference

Existential positive psychology and integrative meaning therapy

Activating Embodied Imagination During COVID-19: A Performative Reflexive Autoethnography

Resilience and Meaning-Making Amid the COVID-19 Epidemic in China

A Reflection on Special Challenges and Amending Pedagogy in Clinical Social Work Practice Courses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Ethnographic Quest in the Midst of COVID-19

Existential–Humanistic Therapy and Disaster Response: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic

Adapting emotion-focused therapy for teletherapy

Connectedness: an interdisciplinary approach in response to the Covid-19 pandemic (learning from Ki Ageng Suryomentaram, Ibn ‘Arabī and Teilhard de Chardin)

Splits in the fabric: A community psychoanalytic project during COVID-19

Art Therapy in Pandemics: Lessons for COVID-19

Transparent boundaries as scenographies of trust: the COVID-19 pandemic from the view of material cultural studies and artistic works

Cognitive dissonance and mindset perturbations during crisis: “eco-socio-psycho-somatic” perspectives

Love in the Time of COVID-19: Experiences of a Psychology Trainee