Kinetics of postoperative circulating cell-free DNA and impact on minimal residual disease detection rates in patients with resected stage I-III colorectal cancer.

Stacey A. Cohen,Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi,Vasily N. Aushev,Diana L. Hanna,Gregory P. Botta,Saima Sharif,Georgios I. Laliotis MD, PhD,Vivek R. Sharma,Ali Alqahtani,Sreenivasa R Chandana,Sandra Kang,Sakti Chakrabarti,Bradley G. Somer,Anup Kasi,Farshid Dayyani,Midhun Malla,Adham A Jurdi,Minetta C. Liu,Alexey Aleshin,Scott Kopetz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.5
IF: 45.3
2023-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:5 Background: A growing body of evidence supports the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a useful biomarker for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) in colorectal cancer (CRC). Immediately after surgery or during adjuvant therapy, high levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from normal tissue may limit the detection of tumor-derived ctDNA. The optimal timing of blood collection for reliable MRD detection after surgery or adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective, U.S.-based, multi-institutional study, data from commercial ctDNA testing in 16,347 patients with stage I-III CRC were analyzed. Complete clinical data were available for 417 patients with 2,538 plasma samples collected between 6/2019 and 4/2022. The median follow-up for relapsed and non-relapsed patients was 730 and 615 days, respectively. A personalized, tumor-informed multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera) was used to quantify ctDNA prior to surgery and postoperatively in a longitudinal manner. We analyzed the kinetics of total cfDNA and compared it with the ctDNA MRD positivity rates at various time points after surgery. Results: Among all patients, cfDNA levels were higher immediately after surgery (0-2 weeks) and gradually declined during the subsequent 2-8 weeks (p 6 months post-operatively and subsequent to any adjuvant therapy) was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival as compared to ctDNA negative patients (MRD: HR 14.1, 95% CI: 5.8-34; p<0.0001; and surveillance HR 20.6, 95% CI: 10.6-37.6; p<0.0001), respectively. On analyzing cfDNA dynamics during adjuvant therapy, cfDNA levels gradually increased between 8 weeks and 8 months after surgery (p=0.0001), suggesting a potential impact of treatment on cell death and cfDNA shed. Conclusions: This is one of the first, large-scale in-depth studies evaluating treatment-based fluctuations in post-operative cfDNA and its correlation with ctDNA-positivity. Our analyses demonstrated no significant impact of plasma cfDNA levels on ctDNA detection rates across different MRD windows using a tumor-informed approach. This may affect real-world application of personalized ctDNA testing by allowing earlier testing windows, as well as guide clinical trial designs using ctDNA as an integral biomarker.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?