Abstract:Background: Outcome measures that are count variables with excessive zeros are common in health behaviors research. Examples include the number of standard drinks consumed or alcohol‐related problems experienced over time. There is a lack of empirical data about the relative performance of prevailing statistical models for assessing the efficacy of interventions when outcomes are zero‐inflated, particularly compared with recently developed marginalized count regression approaches for such data. Methods: The current simulation study examined five commonly used approaches for analyzing count outcomes, including two linear models (with outcomes on raw and log‐transformed scales, respectively) and three prevailing count distribution‐based models (ie, Poisson, negative binomial, and zero‐inflated Poisson (ZIP) models). We also considered the marginalized zero‐inflated Poisson (MZIP) model, a novel alternative that estimates the overall effects on the population mean while adjusting for zero‐inflation. Motivated by alcohol misuse prevention trials, extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate and compare the statistical power and Type I error rate of the statistical models and approaches across data conditions that varied in sample size (N=100 to 500), zero rate (0.2 to 0.8), and intervention effect sizes. Results: Under zero‐inflation, the Poisson model failed to control the Type I error rate, resulting in higher than expected false positive results. When the intervention effects on the zero (vs. non‐zero) and count parts were in the same direction, the MZIP model had the highest statistical power, followed by the linear model with outcomes on the raw scale, negative binomial model, and ZIP model. The performance of the linear model with a log‐transformed outcome variable was unsatisfactory. Conclusions: The MZIP model demonstrated better statistical properties in detecting true intervention effects and controlling false positive results for zero‐inflated count outcomes. This MZIP model may serve as an appealing analytical approach to evaluating overall intervention effects in studies with count outcomes marked by excessive zeros.

A Tutorial on Bayesian Analysis of Count Data Using JAGS

Using JAGS for Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: A Tutorial

The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives

Too many zeros and/or highly skewed? A tutorial on modelling health behaviour as count data with Poisson and negative binomial regression

A New Regression Model for the Analysis of Overdispersed and Zero-Modified Count Data

A Bayesian Zero-Inflated Dirichlet-Multinomial Regression Model for Multivariate Compositional Count Data

Zero-inflated Beta distribution regression modeling

Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS)

Statistical model for overdispersed count outcome with many zeros: an approach for direct marginal inference

A tutorial for joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data in R

Bayesian density regression for count data

Random Effects Modeling and the Zero-Inflated Poisson Distribution

Efficient Data Augmentation in Dynamic Models for Binary and Count Data

The consequences of checking for zero-inflation and overdispersion in the analysis of count data

Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Measurements and Time-to-event Outcomes Using BUGS

A simulation study of the performance of statistical models for count outcomes with excessive zeros

Review of Probability Distributions for Modeling Count Data

Zero to k Inflated Poisson Regression Models with Applications

A Tutorial on Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes

A new Bayesian regression model for counts in medicine

Zero-inflated Poisson Models with Censored Data and Its Application