Abstract:Objective:To investigate and compare the effectiveness and safety of infrared bipolar radiofrequency (IR-RF) and nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) including 1 540 nm Er: glass and 1 927 nm thulium-doped laser, so as to choose a better pathway for clinical treatments on periorbital wrinkles.Methods:A prospective randomized self-controlled study was conducted in the Department of Laser and Aesthetic Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital. A total of 27 patients divided into 3 groups by random number table underwent split-face treatments between December 2019 and January 2021. Two of the three treatments were selected randomly for patients in each group: Group A, left side IR-RF vs. right side 1 540 nm NAFL; Group B, left side IR-RF vs. right side 1 927 nm NAFL; Group C, left side 1 540 nm NAFL vs. right side 1 927 nm NAFL. In total 3 sessions were given at 2 months interval. Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated by subjective (GAIS and Fitzpatrick wrinkle score) and objective (VISIA-CR) assessments. Side effects and pain visual evaluation (VAS) were also recorded. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the differences among the three therapeutic method , and relationships with VAS and patients’ age.Results:In total 30 patients (10 in each group) were recruited and finally 27 cases completed all treatments and follow-ups: Group A, 9 patients (male 3, female 6); Group B, 8 patients (male 3, female 5); Group C, 10 patients (male 4, female 6). The age distributions: Group A, 33-65 years, mean 36.9 years; Group B, 28-67 years, mean 38.6 years; Group C, 25-58 years, mean 37.8 years. GAIS comparisons: no statistical differences were found in each group between baseline and post-treatment ( P>0.05). Fitzpatrick wrinkle score: the overall analysis showed significant improvements were not found in IR-RF treated-side but were observed in 1 540 nm and 1 927 nm NAFL treated sides ( P<0.05). Furthermore, the 1 927 nm NAFL treated side showed more decreased scores than 1 540 nm NAFL treated side ( P<0.05). The VISIA analysis of feature counts of skin texture showed similar result. Besides, the patients over 50 years old showed significantly improvements compared with the ones under this age threshold in IR-RF treated sides ( P<0.05). The pain VAS in IR-RF treated side was significant lower than NAFL-treated side (2.2 vs. 5.8, P<0.05). Only one patient reported post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) in 1540 nm NAFL treated side, which disappeared progressively in 4 months after last treatment. Conclusion:Nonablative fractional laser is effective and safe in improving periorbital wrinkles. Infrared bipolar radiofrequency might be more suitable for elderly patients especially with low pain level.

Hyaluronic Acid Dissolving Microneedles and Nonablative Fractional Laser for Infraorbital Wrinkles: A Prospective, Randomized, Split-Face Study

Effectiveness and Safety of Nonablative Fractional Laser and Infrared Bipolar Radiofrequency for Treating Periorbital Wrinkles

Efficacy of Soluble Hyaluronic Acid Microneedle on Removing Suborbital Wrinkles

Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial

The Efficacy and Safety of DermalaxTM DEEP in the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Comparing Monophasic Monodensified and Biphasic Nonanimal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers in Treatment of Asian Nasolabial Folds

A Randomized, Multicenter Study on a Flexible Hyaluronic Acid Filler in Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Nasolabial Folds in a Chinese Population

Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel with Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical Assessment of Non-ablative Fractional Laser Combined with Transdermal Delivery of Botulinum Toxin A in Treating Periocular Wrinkles

The Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Microneedling Versus a Nonablative Fractional 1,550-nm Erbium:Glass Laser for the Rejuvenation of the Neck

Efficacy and Safety of Two Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A 64-Week, Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Within-Subject Study.

The Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of A Radiofrequency Hydro-Injector Device for the Skin around the Eye Area

A randomized, split-face, double-blind, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of small- and large-particle hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of nasolabial folds

Updates on laser and aesthetic medicine (2020-2021)

Therapeutic Effectiveness of Microneedling Radio Frequency in Different Areas of Periorbital Static Wrinkles: A Self‐Controlled Study

Periorbital Skin Rejuvenation of Asian Skin Using Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency

Microneedling With RF‐Assisted Skin Penetration Improves the Hard‐to‐Treat Periorbital Wrinkles: Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Comparison of Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency Therapy with Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Periorbital Rejuvenation

A hyaluronic acid-based micro-filler improves superficial wrinkles and skin quality: a randomized prospective controlled multicenter study

Safety and efficacy of hyaluronic acid for the correction of nasolabial folds: a meta-analysis.

Curative effects of microneedle fractional radiofrequency system on skin laxity in Asian patients: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled face-split study