Abstract:Economic crime rates tend to be high and generate large losses every year, because one of the biggest factors is the ineffective economic crime policy in providing deterrent and firmness to the perpetrators. Economic crime policies play an important role in creating public welfare, if the economic crime rate is high, it means that the welfare of the community has not been created optimally, so there needs to be efforts to review and fix these criminal policies. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of Indonesia's criminal policy in the perspective of Islamic law, as well as to criticize the economic criminal policy in Indonesia. This research explores data sources from various data on the facts of crimes that occur in Indonesia, which are then analyzed by qualitative methods from the point of view of Islamic law. The results of this research show that economic crime policies have not been effective in tackling economic crimes, because they do not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of economic crimes. Whereas in Islam, the prevention of economic crime is divided into two categories, namely jarimah hudud and jarimah ta'zir. Sanctions applied in Islamic law are more of a deterrent effect, because sanctions for serious economic crimes have been determined directly by Allah SWT, then economic criminal policies in Indonesia tend not to achieve their essential goals, namely welfare and social protection for the community, this happens because there are shortcomings in the three stages of implementing economic criminal policies in Indonesia, namely the legislative stage, judicial stage, and executive stage. It is necessary to make a new formulation in the economic criminal policy in Indonesia, namely by specifying the sanctions that will be received by the perpetrators of criminal acts with the sanctions stated in Islamic law, from the point of view of the deterrent effect and the consequences received by the perpetrators.

Recognition of Islamic Jurisprudence to the People's Republic of China's Model of Awarding Capital Punishment to the Convicts of Financial Corruption

Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: an Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Honor Killing Phenomena in Pakistan

Legal Comparison against the Death Penalty Sanctions regulated in the Positive Laws of Indonesia and China

Contribution of Islamic Law Concerning The Death Penalty to the Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Law

Rethinking of the Death Penalty System in China

Implementation of the Applicability of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Through a Review of Pancasila-Based Islamic Law

The Criminal Law Policy Regarding the Death Penalty in Renewing of Indonesian Criminal Law

Death Penalty in Criminal Law of Russia, China and Mongolia: A Comparative Legal Analysis with Examples from the Judicial Practice of Contemporary China

Overlapping Penalties in the Jurisprudence of the Four Schools of Thought: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study

Chinese Public Opinions on Death Penalty: Measurement, Analysis and Communication

The Debate Over the Death Penalty in Today’s China

Wrongful Convictions Without Punishment Trought Judicial Pardon Perspective Fiqh Islamic Criminal Law

Opinions on Retention Versus Abolition of the Death Penalty

Analisis Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana di Indonesia, Jepang, Inggris, dan Pakistan

CRITICISM ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INDONESIA'S ECONOMIC CRIMINAL POLICY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC LAW

The death penalty and society in contemporary China

Implementation of Restorative Justice to Corruption Crimes According to The Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law And Islamic Law

The Debate on the Abolition of Capital Punishment As Applied to Economic Crimes in China

Death Sentence with a Two-Year Reprieve Shall Be an Inevitable Due Process