Conceptualizing Creativity: General and Cultural Biases in Gough's Creative Personality Scale
Raphael Luescher,Petra Young‐Zie Barthelmess,Su‐Yeong Kim,Ulf Henning Richter,Michael Mittag
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.160
2016-09-19
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Abstract:This study analyzes the validity of Gough's Creative Personality Scale (CPS) for the Adjective Check List (ACL) by using 1773 Swiss, South Korean, and Mainland Chinese students as a sample. Four sources of potential bias were identified in Gough's CPS, two of which are general and two cultural in nature. The two general biases were investigated by conducting correlation analyses and evaluating alternative scoring methods for the CPS. As a result of the first bias, checking a large number of adjectives was found to be more important for achieving a high score than checking the relevant ones. Due to the second bias, the CPS score mostly depends on the number of positive adjectives checked while negative items have little impact. The two cultural biases were analyzed using an implicit version of the CPS (iCPS) and factor analysis. The latter revealed three different clusters of creativity type: exploratory‐type, socially responsible‐type, and intellectual‐type creativity. Based on cultural background, they are all weighted differently, causing a potential experiential bias in the CPS. Findings indicate that in South Korea and Mainland China socially responsible‐type creativity dominates whereas in Switzerland exploratory‐type creativity prevails. Findings from the iCPS suggest the second cultural bias, the socially desirable responding bias arising from differences in responding styles among the three cultures.Creativity is considered to be one of the most defining of human capacities. Complex in nature, it finds expression in many human endeavors, from art and business to architecture and technology. Creativity is shaped by external forces such as culture as well as internal forces such as personality and can generally be evaluated and described through either explicit or implicit theories (Runco, 1999; Sternberg, 1985). Explicit theories are often based on empirically tested hypotheses, which are analyzed by means of creativity tests such as Gough's (1979) Creative Personality Scale (CPS) (Runco, 2014). Major impediments to the study of explicit theories, however, are the difficulty of defining creativity (Sternberg, 1999) and the problem of agreeing on criteria for measuring creativity (Batey & Furnham, 2006). Such criteria, even the two most widely accepted ones, "novelty" and "usefulness," depend on who is to judge them (Runco & Jaeger, 2012). What is acknowledged to be a novelty in one culture may not be seen as one in another. In Western societies, "novelty" is often associated with radical change and categorically new and different ideas, whereas in Asian countries "novelty" also refers to continuous incremental improvement, modification, and adaptation (Puccio & Chimento, 2001). Consequently, the reliability of creativity tests used to articulate explicit theories is increasingly being questioned, especially when applied across different cultures (Kim, 2006; Piffer, 2012). Implicit theory of creativity can somewhat mitigate the aforementioned drawbacks of explicit theories. The difficulty in defining creativity, for instance, is not an area of concern for implicit theories. Runco (1999) noted that "implicit theories allow us to judge creative behavior even if we cannot define creativity" (p. 28). Implicit theories need to be discovered rather than invented because they measure internalized psychological constructs that are commonly held by laypeople such as teachers, students, or parents (Sternberg, 1985; Runco, 2014). Implicit theories are valuable because ideas about what constitutes creativity shape expectations, which in turn lead to actual behavior (Runco, 2014). According to Rudowicz (2003), most studies on implicit theories of creativity have either focused on creative individuals (personality characteristics that describe a creative individual) or the conceptualization of creativity (what laypeople perceive creativity to be). This study aims to synthesize advantages of explicit and implicit theories. Personality characteristics indicative of creative individuals in Switzerland, South Korea, and Mainland China are identified using an implicit version of Gough's CPS and compared to results obtained from a traditional, explicit application of -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, educational