Abstract:BACKGROUND:Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating experimental treatments but often require large sample sizes. Single-arm trials require smaller sample sizes but are subject to bias when using historical control data for comparative inferences. This article presents a Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design that exploits historical control data to create a hybrid of a single-arm trial and a randomized controlled trial.METHODS:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design has two stages. In stage 1, a prespecified number of patients are enrolled in a single arm given the experimental treatment. Based on the stage 1 data, applying propensity score matching and Bayesian posterior prediction methods, the usefulness of the historical control data for identifying a pseudo sample of matched synthetic-control patients for making comparative inferences is evaluated. If a sufficient number of synthetic controls can be identified, the single-arm trial is continued. If not, the trial is switched to a randomized controlled trial. The performance of The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design is evaluated by computer simulation.RESULTS:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design achieves power and unbiasedness similar to a randomized controlled trial but on average requires a much smaller sample size, provided that the historical control data patients are sufficiently comparable to the trial patients so that a good number of matched controls can be identified in the historical control data. Compared to a single-arm trial, The Bayesian adaptive synthetic control design yields much higher power and much smaller bias.CONCLUSION:The Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design provides a useful tool for exploiting historical control data to improve the efficiency of single-arm phase II clinical trials, while addressing the problem of bias when comparing trial results to historical control data. The proposed design achieves power similar to a randomized controlled trial but may require a substantially smaller sample size.

Designs for animal experiments under two-way blocking structure in the presence of systematic trend

What is the optimum design for my animal experiment?

Half the price, twice the gain: How to simultaneously decrease animal numbers and increase precision with good experimental design

Copula-based robust optimal block designs

Practical Aspects of Experimental Design in Animal Research

BASIC: A Bayesian Adaptive Synthetic-Control Design for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Efficient Designs in Small Blocks for Comparing Consecutive Pairs of Treatments

Testing for Efficacy in Single-Subject Trials with Intervention Analysis

Bayesian optimal blocking of factorial designs

Optimality of Pairwise Blocked Definitive Screening Designs

Synthetic Principal Component Design: Fast Covariate Balancing with Synthetic Controls

General Principles, Designs, and Statistical Analyses in Experimental Animal Studies

The Optimality of Blocking Designs in Equally and Unequally Allocated Randomized Experiments with General Response

How cage effects can hurt statistical analyses of completely randomized designs

Optimal Designs For Two Non-Interactive Treatment

Rethinking animal attrition in preclinical research: Expressing causal mechanisms of selection bias using directed acyclic graphs

Identification Of Universally Optimal Circular Designs For The Interference Model

CONSTRUCTION OF OPTIMAL BLOCKING SCHEMES FOR ROBUST PARAMETER DESIGNS

Optimal designs for two-stage inference

Enhancing statistical inference in psychological research via prospective and retrospective design analysis

Time-trend impact on treatment estimation in two-arm clinical trials with a binary outcome and Bayesian response adaptive randomization