Abstract:Background: In 2021, a Chinese court, based on the newly enacted Civil Code, first revoked a marriage license due to the spouse's failure to disclose their HIV infection before the marriage. This landmark case ignited a fresh debate on whether people living with HIV (PLHIV) have a legal duty to inform their spouses and sexual partners. Advances in medicine have partially isolated HIV transmission from sexual contact, extending the legal basis for the obligation to disclose beyond disease prevention. This study investigates some possibly unforeseen challenges for PLHIV in China to fulfill this duty, and the outcomes of their decisions in light of the government's goal to promote health. Methods: This study aims to provide a detailed examination of the legal provisions and practices concerning partner notification among PLHIV in China. A mixed-methods research approach was employed between 2019 and 2020, combining questionnaire surveys, in-depth interviews, and participatory observations. A total of 433 valid responses were obtained through a questionnaire posted on a Chinese online platform for PLHIV. Following the collection and random coding of the questionnaire data, 40 individuals living with HIV were selected for in-depth interviews. Subsequently, a six-month field investigation was conducted in Guan ai jia yuan (Caring Home) in Jinhua City to further explore this issue. Results: A considerable proportion of PLHIV exhibit a high rate of disclosure to their spouses (nearly 80%). In the context of sexual partners, 56% of PLHIV stated that their sexual partners were aware of their HIV infection. Whether married PLHIV disclosing to their spouses or unmarried/divorced PLHIV disclosing to sexual partners, however, a substantial majority expressed apprehension about the potential disruption to their relationships that the disclosure might cause. The sole exception was observed among married PLHIV in extramarital relationships who demonstrated a slightly diminished level of concern in this context. Reasons for non-disclosure predominantly included undetectable viral load and the adoption of protective measures. Discussion: This study reveals that a prevailing "HIV stigma" hinders PLHIV from voluntarily fulfilling the disclosure duties bestowed by Article 38 of the Regulations on the Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS, and the unclear legal provisions of the new Civil Code play a significant role in this regard. Addressing this issue necessitates not only increasing societal tolerance toward PLHIV and reducing instances of social exclusion but also shifting the legal basis of disclosure duties from disease prevention to rights and obligations within the legal relationships of the parties involved. When it comes to the recipients of disclosure, for instance, it is crucial to differentiate between spouses and sexual partners. As for PLHIV failing to fulfill their disclosure duties, apart from interventions involving indirect notifications, the addition of further legal responsibilities may not be advisable. Intentional transmission actions, on the other hand, should still be subject to severe penalties. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Criminal-legal characteristics of putting at risk of HIV infection

Dilemma of Concepts and Strategies for the Prevention of Spread of Hiv in Relation to Human Behavior, Law and Human Rights

Anxiety about HIV criminalisation among people living with HIV in Australia

Criminalization of HIV Exposure: A Review of Empirical Studies in the United States

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF FALSE INFORMATION DURING THE PANDEMIC: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

AIDS Panic in the Twenty-First Century: The Tenuous Legal Status of HIV-Positive Persons in America

[Is there a special responsibility of HIV-positive people? A discussion paper]

[The HIV infection - the limits of prevention concepts. Consideration with respect to responsibilities incumbent on the infected individual, politics and society at large]

The Russian HIV residence ban and state control of migration

The Role of Anti-Discrimination Principle in Establishing and Implementation of the Right to Freedom of Movement and Labor Rights of People with HIV-Positive Status: a Comparative Analysis

Criminalistic Characteristic of Intentional Infliction of Serious Harm to Human Health

PENALIZATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE COVID-19 VACCINATION: TO BE OR NOT TO BE?

AIDS and human sexuality

Balancing public health and privacy rights: a mixed-methods study on disclosure obligations of people living with HIV to their partners in China

[Medical Legal Identification of Post-Transfusion HIV/AIDS].

Current Trends in HIV Infection in the Republic of Crimea

Public danger of breaches on epidemic security (conceptual issues)

Social and structural risks for HIV among migrant and immigrant men who have sex with men in Moscow, Russia: implications for prevention

Factors Associated with Fatal COVID-19 Outcomes among People Living with HIV: A Cohort Study

High-Tech and Criminal Challenges

Forensic medical assessment of the cases of HIV infection and hemocontact viral hepatitis B and C during the period from 2011 till 2015 in different subjects of the Russian Federation