Abstract:This paper casts a deliberately critical eye over the government's ‘community safety'proposals as outlined in the UK Crime and Disorder Act 1998, their philosophical origins, their ambiguities and their potential for social exclusion. After an evaluation of some specific proposals in the Act, the paper goes on to suggest that community safety elements within the Act and associated policy initiatives embody three principal dynamics, namely appeals to community, managerialism and inter‐organisational partnerships. Within and between these dynamics lie deep ambiguities and conflicts, which may encourage, rather than hold back, the dynamics of social exclusion. It is argued that the government's proposals — under the influence of a certain brand of communitarian thought — display much confusion as to how ‘communities’ can contribute to the construction of social order. Moreover, the notion of community collides with existing social fragmentation and the commodificalion of security, which may fuel exclusionary elements of community safety practice. The paper goes on to consider the existence of important tensions between the managerialist preoccupations of policy and the rhetoric of ‘partnerships’, which pervade community safety. These can serve to undermine the intentions of legislators. Within the dynamics of crime prevention practice and appeals to ‘community’ there are dangers that ‘security differentials’ become increasingly significant characteristics of wealth and status. For community safety to hold back the dynamics of social exclusion, both government and local community safety practitioners will need to foster the conditions in which partnerships can flourish and to nurture forms of co‐operation, rooted in mutual acceptance of difference and inter‐organisational trust.

Private security discretion: Economic rules, social norms and situational judgement in the night-time economy

Gendering Discretion: Why Street-Level Bureaucracy Needs a Gendered Lens

Uneasy Partners Against Crime: The Ambivalent Relationship Between the Police and the Private Security Industry in Mexico

The Discretional Dilemmas of the Street-level Bureaucracy

Commodifying Justice: Discursive Strategies Used in the Legitimation of Infringement Notices for Minor Offences

Reconfiguring the violent encounter? Preloading, security staff and breathalyser use in the night-time economy

The Interplay between Public and Private Enforcement in European Private Law: Law and Economics Perspective

Private policing of white-collar crime: case studies of internal investigations by fraud examiners

Community safety and the quest for security: Holding back the dynamics of social exclusion

The public-private divide revisited: questioning the middle ground of hybridity in policing

Market Opportunities and Political Responsibilities: the Difficult Development of Chinese Private Security Companies Abroad

An Exploration of the Juxtaposition of Professional and Political Accountability in Local Law Enforcement Management

Privacy regulations and economic efficiency: a dynamic perspective

The political economy of criminal governance

'Security' and private governance in São Paulo's corporate centrality frontier

Beyond control? The political economy of private interception, intrusion, and surveillance markets

Cops in crisis?: ethnographic insights on a new era of politicization, activism, accountability, and change in transatlantic policing

Discretion in the Automated Administrative State

Assessing the determinants of public confidence in the police: A case study of a post-conflict community in Northern Ireland

Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance: A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Administration

Provisional police authority in Maputo’s inner-city periphery