Abstract:Background: Studies have documented that utilizing peer feedback can enhance students' English academic writing skills. Little is known, however, about the effects of incorporating peer feedback to enhance English as a second language (L2) medical students' academic writing performance. Methods: This longitudinal interventional study examines Chinese medical students' English academic writing skills development via peer feedback in four parallel classes over an 18-week semester between the experimental and control groups (n = 124). Results: Significant increases in the experimental group's performance in the post-test were found after 18-week instructions (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p < .001; task response, p < .001; coherence and cohesion, p < .001; lexical resource, p < .001; grammatical range and accuracy, p < .001), and the effects were retained in the delayed post-test 6 weeks later (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .561; task response, p = .585; coherence and cohesion, p = .533; lexical resource, p = .796; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .670). Little improvement was found in the control group in the post-test (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p = .213; task response, p = .275; coherence and cohesion, p = .383; lexical resource, p = .367; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .180) or the delayed post-test (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .835; task response, p = .742; coherence and cohesion, p = .901; lexical resource, p = .897; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .695). Between-group comparisons indicate that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the post- and the delayed post-tests, as shown in their overall score and scores on the four components. Conclusions: Incorporating peer feedback into process-oriented medical English writing classroom teaching can effectively enhance Chinese medical students' English academic writing skills over time, while the traditional product-oriented writing instructions had little help in improving Chinese medical students' academic writing skills. This longitudinal intervention study develops our understanding of the effectiveness of peer feedback in L2 academic writing pedagogy. It offers instructional implications for L2 writing teachers to teach English academic writing among medical students in China and beyond. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are discussed.

Differential Effects of Focused/Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on Learning Transfer in Students of Medical Sciences

A comparative study of the impact of focused vs. comprehensive corrective feedback and revision on ESL learners’ writing accuracy and quality

Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study

The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing

Peer feedback and Chinese medical students' English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study

Assessing the effect of giving and receiving written corrective feedback on improving L2 writing accuracy: does giving and receiving feedback have fair mutual benefit?

Effects of Focused Written Feedback and Revision in the Development of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in EFL Writing

Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course

Effects of Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback on the Writing Achievement of First-Year Ethiopian University Students

Student engagement with teacher and automated written corrective feedback on L2 writing: A multiple case study

Enhancing Writing Proficiency: The Role of Model Essays as Corrective Feedback Tools in IELTS Writing Task Achievement and Coherence/Cohesion

The effect of face-to-face versus web-based structured peer review on writing improvement: Evidence from ESP students

Analysis of high-frequency errors and linguistic patterns in EFL medical students' English writing: Insights from a learner corpus

Student Writers’ Affective Engagement with Grammar-Centred Written Corrective Feedback: The Impact of (Mis)Aligned Practices and Perceptions

Exploring Students’ Engagement with Peer-and Teacher Written Feedback in an EFL Writing Course: A Multiple Case Study of Iranian Graduate Learners

Teachers’ translanguaging practices in providing written corrective feedback: An exploratory study of learners’ affective engagement with feedback

The Effect of Six Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Iranian English Language Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2

Study of the Effects of Direct Focused Versus Direct Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of Prepositions in English Writing of High School Students

The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL)

Writing-skills development in the health professions

Student Engagement with Teacher Written Corrective Feedback among Chinese Private College Students of Varying Language Proficiencies