Abstract:The Hadley circulation (HC) is the strongest and largest meridional circulation, playing a crucial role in influencing the global climate. A regime shift is observed in the boreal winter HC variability after 1980, presenting as an equatorially symmetrical pattern. This study examines the performances of 26 CMIP6 models in simulating the variability of boreal winter HC after 1980, analyzes the possible physical processes of the simulation uncertainties, and predicts its future variations. The results reveal that all models can reasonably capture the spatial structure of the climatological boreal winter HC. However, significant inter–model discrepancies are existed in the simulations of the spatial distribution of its linear trend, the dominant mode of HC (EOF1), as well as El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). By examining the spatial structure of HC EOF1 and ENSO between the simulations and observations, all the models are categorized into three groups, i.e., both the HC EOF1 and ENSO are well–simulated group (WWG), the simulation of HC EOF1 is unsatisfactory and ENSO is well–simulated group (UWG), and neither the simulations of HC EOF1 and ENSO is satisfactory (UUG). The group analysis suggests that the WWG models can well simulate the robust relationship between the HC EOF1 and ENSO, while the UWG and UUG models fail in reproducing the connection between the EOF1 and ENSO. In the WWG models, a greater variability of ENSO would associate with a stronger linkage between the HC EOF1 and ENSO, implying that the amplitude of ENSO variability determines the linkage between HC and ENSO. Conversely, the opposite situation is observed in the UWG and UUG models. The failure of UWG and UUG models in reproducing the relationship of HC EOF–ENSO is mainly due to its unsatisfactory simulation in the ENSO variability. This result shows that a model's ability in simulating the ENSO variability affects its capacity in simulating the relationship between the HC EOF1 and ENSO, which in turn impacting its performance in charactering the variability of HC. Furthermore, the HC EOF1 is projected to maintain an equatorially symmetrical structure towards the end of this century. Compared to the period 1980–2013, the variability of ENSO by century–end has intensified, leading to a stronger association between ENSO and HC EOF1 and a strengthened HC EOF1. These findings further support of the conclusion. Our work focuses on the discrepancies of the simulation of the variability in boreal winter HC and its future prediction in CMIP6, providing valuable insights for the advancement of climate models and understanding the relationship between ENSO and HC.

Inter-model spreads of the climatological mean Hadley circulation in AMIP/CMIP6 simulations

Inter-model Spread of the Climatological Annual Mean Hadley Circulation and Its Relationship with the Double ITCZ Bias in CMIP5

Relationships between the Hadley circulation and tropical sea surface temperature with different meridional structures simulated in CMIP6 models

Concurrent Inter‐Model Spread of Boreal Winter Westerly Jet Meridional Positions Between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres in CMIP6 Models

Processes Driving the Intermodel Spread of the Southern Hemisphere Hadley Circulation Expansion in CMIP6 Models

Climatology and interannual variability of the annual mean Hadley circulation in CMIP5 models

Inter‐Model Spread of the Simulated East Asian Summer Monsoon Rainfall and the Associated Atmospheric Circulations from the CMIP6 Models

Attribution of Biases of Interhemispheric Temperature Contrast in CMIP6 Models

Structure of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in Three Generations of Climate Models

Contrasting Responses of the Hadley Circulation to Equatorially Asymmetric and Symmetric Meridional Sea Surface Temperature Structures

Can CMIP6 models reproduce the influence of ENSO on the variability of boreal winter Hadley Circulation?

The Atlantic Meridional Mode and Associated Wind–SST Relationship in the CMIP6 Models

Sources of the inter‐model spread in projected global monsoon hydrological sensitivity

Assessing the performance of 33 CMIP6 models in simulating the large-scale environmental fields of tropical cyclones

Dynamical Constraint on Precipitation Biases Over the Indo‐Pacific Region During Boreal Summer in AMIP6 Models

Do CMIP6 models capture the observed anomalous asymmetric Hadley circulation during historical El Niño decaying stage

Intermodel Biases of the Western North Pacific Monsoon Trough in CMIP6 Models

Sources of the Intermodel Spread in Projected Global Monsoon Hydrological Sensitivity

Systematic improvement in simulated latent and sensible heat fluxes over tropical oceans in AMIP6 models compared to AMIP5 models with the same resolutions

Interhemispheric propagation of seasonal sea surface temperature fluctuations over the western Pacific in CMIP6

Responses of the Hadley Circulation to Regional Sea Surface Temperature Changes