Abstract:Metabolic scaling theory (MST) predicts a ‘universal scaling law’ for plant mass–density relationships, but empirical observations are more variable. Possible explanations of this variability include plasticity in biomass allocation between the above‐ and belowground compartment and different modes of competition, which can be asymmetric or symmetric. Although complex interactions of these factors are likely to occur, so far the majority of modelling and empirical studies has focussed on mono‐factorial explanations. We here present a generic individual‐based model, which allows exploring the plant mass–density relationship in realistic settings by representing plasticity of biomass allocation and different modes of competition in the above‐ and belowground compartment. Plants grew according to an ontogenetic growth model derived from MST. To evaluate the behavior of the simulated plants related to the allocation patterns and to validate model predictions, we conducted greenhouse experiments with tree seedlings. The model reproduced empirical patterns both at the individual and population level. Without belowground resource limitation, aboveground processes dominated and the slopes of mass–density relationships followed the predictions of MST. In contrast, resource limitation led to an increased allocation of biomass to belowground parts of the plants. The subsequent dominance of symmetric belowground competition caused significantly shallower slopes of the mass–density relationship, even though the growth of individual plants followed MST. We conclude that changes in biomass allocation induced by belowground resource limitation explain the deviations from the mass–density relationship predicted by MST. Taking into account the plasticity of biomass allocation and its linkage to the above‐ and belowground competition is critical for fully representing plant communities, in particular for correctly predicting their response of carbon storage and sequestration to changing environmental conditions.

Biomass competition connects individual and community scaling patterns

Biomass competition unifies individual and community scaling patterns

Plant Interactions Alter the Predictions of Metabolic Scaling Theory

Scaling body size fluctuations

General Enzyme-Driven Rule of Metabolic Scaling with Body Mass and Evolution in Organisms

Metabolic scaling is the product of life-history optimization

Interspecific allometric scaling of unicellular organisms as an evolutionary process of food chain creation

Shifts in Mass Scaling of Respiration, Feeding, and Growth Rates across Life-Form Transitions in Marine Pelagic Organisms

Eco-evolutionary emergence of macroecological scaling in plankton communities

Integrating metabolic scaling and coexistence theories

Toward a metabolic theory of catchments: Scaling of water and carbon fluxes with size

Metabolic allometric scaling of multicellular organisms as a product of evolutionary development and optimization of food chains

Enzymatic Origin and Various Curvatures of Metabolic Scaling in Microbes

Metabolic scaling in small life forms

Metabolic Allometric Scaling of Unicellular Organisms as a Product of Selection Guided by Optimization of Nutrients Distribution in Food Chains

Biological scaling in green algae: the role of cell size and geometry

Insights Into Plant Size-Density Relationships From Models And Agricultural Crops

Dynamics of growth, death, and resource competition in sessile organisms

The Role of Belowground Competition and Plastic Biomass Allocation in Altering Plant Mass–density Relationships

A Concept Model about Allometric Scaling of Hierarchical Energy Flow Through Plant Biosystems

Covariations in ecological scaling laws fostered by community dynamics