Superior detection rate of plasma cell FISH using FACS-FISH
Marie-France Gagnon,Sally M Midthun,James A Fangel,Cynthia M Schuh,Ivy M Luoma,Kathryn E Pearce,Reid G Meyer,Sikander Ailawadhi,Mariano J Arribas,Esteban Braggio,Rafael Fonseca,S Vincent Rajkumar,Cinthya Zepeda-Mendoza,Xinjie Xu,Patricia T Greipp,Michael M Timm,Gregory E Otteson,Min Shi,Dragan Jevremovic,Horatiu Olteanu,Jess F Peterson,Rhett P Ketterling,Shaji Kumar,Linda B Baughn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad108
2024-01-04
Abstract:Objectives: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs) requires plasma cell (PC) identification or purification strategies to optimize results. We compared the efficacy of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin FISH (cIg-FISH) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting FISH (FACS-FISH) in a clinical laboratory setting. Methods: The FISH analysis results of 14,855 samples from individuals with a suspected PCN subjected to cytogenetic evaluation between 2019 and 2022 with cIg-FISH (n = 6917) or FACS-FISH (n = 7938) testing were analyzed. Results: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH increased the detection rate of abnormalities in comparison with cIg-FISH, with abnormal results documented in 54% vs 50% of cases, respectively (P < .001). It improved the detection of IGH::CCND1 (P < .001), IGH::MAF (P < .001), IGH::MAFB (P < .001), other IGH rearrangements (P < .001), and gains/amplifications of 1q (P < .001), whereas the detection rates of IGH::FGFR3 fusions (P = .3), loss of 17p (P = .3), and other abnormalities, including hyperdiploidy (P = .5), were similar. Insufficient PC yield for FISH analysis was decreased between cIg-FISH and FACS-FISH (22% and 3% respectively, P < .001). Flow cytometry allowed establishment of ploidy status in 91% of cases. In addition, FACS-FISH decreased analysis times, workload efforts, and operating costs. Conclusions: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH is an efficient PC purification strategy that affords significant improvement in diagnostic yield and decreases workflow requirements in comparison with cIg-FISH.