Abstract:There are two unresolved puzzles in the literature examining how people evaluate mates (i.e., prospective or current romantic/sexual partners). First, compatibility is theoretically crucial, but attempts to explain why certain perceivers are compatible with certain targets have revealed small effects. Second, features of partners (e.g., personality, consensually rated attributes) affect perceivers' evaluations strongly in initial-attraction contexts but weakly in established relationships. Mate Evaluation Theory (MET) addresses these puzzles, beginning with the Social Relations Model postulate that all evaluative constructs (e.g., attraction, relationship satisfaction) consist of target, perceiver, and relationship variance. MET then explains how people draw evaluations from mates' attributes using four information sources: (a) shared evolved mechanisms and cultural scripts (common lens, which produces target variance); (b) individual differences that affect how a perceiver views all targets (perceiver lens, which produces perceiver variance); (c) individual differences that affect how a perceiver views some targets, depending on the targets' features (feature lens, which produces some relationship variance); and (d) narratives about and idiosyncratic reactions to one particular target (target-specific lens, which produces most relationship variance). These two distinct sources of relationship variance (i.e., feature vs. target-specific) address Puzzle #1: Previous attempts to explain compatibility used feature lens information, but relationship variance likely derives primarily from the (understudied) target-specific lens. MET also addresses Puzzle #2 by suggesting that repeated interaction causes the target-specific lens to expand, which reduces perceivers' use of the common lens. We conclude with new predictions and implications at the intersection of the human-mating and person-perception literatures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate

Observed Aspects of Mate Value and Sociosexuality Account for Mate Preferences: Data from a Large, Representative Study from Czechia

Strategies for Becoming a More Desirable Mate: Evidence from 14 Countries

Assortative mating and the evolution of desirability covariation

How Do People Feel About Mates?

A Study on the Mate Selection Standards of Young People with High Education in Shanghai

Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity

Female Mate Copying: Measuring the Effect of Mate-Relevant Information Provided by Former Partners

Are Sex Differences in Mating Preferences Really “Overrated”? The Effects of Sex and Relationship Orientation on Long-Term and Short-Term Mate Preferences

Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

Mate evaluation theory.

Strategies for becoming a more desirable mate: evidence from Lithuania

Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios

Physical Attractiveness, Attitudes Toward Career, and Mate Preferences among Young Chinese Women

What Do Women's Advertised Mate Preferences Reveal? An Analysis of Video Dating Profiles

Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships

Effects of Women’s Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men’s Waist to Chest Ratios

Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication

Mating Performance and Singlehood Across 14 Nations

Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures

Sex Differences in Response to Deception Across Mate-Value Traits of Attractiveness, Job Status, and Altruism in Online Dating