Graphite-polyurethane composite electrode modified with nickel(II) nanoparticles submitted to electrochemical pretreatment in basic medium for the determination of atenolol

João Vitor de Arruda Silva,Éder T.G Cavalheiro,Priscila Cervini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2023.2204439
2023-05-07
Analytical Letters
Abstract:A new approach for the determination of atenolol (ATN) at a graphite polyurethane composite electrode (GPUE) modified with electrodeposited nickel(II) nanoparticles electrochemically pretreated in alkaline medium (GPUE-NiNP) is reported. The electrodeposition of NiNP on the GPUE surface was performed by 5 scans in cyclic voltammetry between 0.0 to −1.5 V ( vs . SCE) and scan rate of 20 mV s −1 in a 0.05 mol L −1 NiSO 4 and 0.32 mol L −1 H 3 BO 3 solution at pH 5. After deposition, the GPUE-NiNP was submitted to an electrochemical pretreatment in 0.50 mol L −1 NaOH by cyclic voltammetry at 100 mV s −1 . The best results were obtained after 50 cycles at 100 mV s −1 . Quantitative measurements at GPUE-NiNP were performed using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) in pH 11 universal buffer. Atenolol promotes a decrease in the nickel oxide signals probably due to a complexation of the analyte with free Ni 2+ in solution. Thus, the analyte was quantified by the signal suppression and an analytical curve was obtained at the GPUE-NiNP using the optimized conditions for 1.0 to 100 x 10 −8 mol L −1 atenolol between 1.0 and 0.0 V ( vs . SCE) with a linear range between 2.0 x 10 −8 and 1.0 x 10 −7 mol L −1 and a limit of detection of 3.47 x 10 −9 mol L −1 with R = 0.9995 for GPUE-NiNP. The procedure was applied to three commercial pharmaceutical formulations with recoveries between 99.5 and 100.7% and agreed with a comparative HPLC procedure within 95% confidence level according to the Student's t -test.
chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?