The effect of altitude on the uncertainty of radar-based precipitation estimates over Switzerland

Esmail Ghaemi,Marco Gabella,Ulrich Foelsche,Ioannis Sideris,Daniele Nerini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2203339
IF: 3.531
2023-05-04
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Abstract:Despite high spatial coverage, radar-based Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) are affected by different sources of errors. Regardless of various techniques to merge these estimates with rain gauges, some errors still remain in the final product. This study focused on the relationship between these errors and altitude for a radar-only product (RZC) and a cross-validated-merged-with-gauge product (CPC-CV) in Switzerland using 16 years of hourly data based on two log-transformed metrics(bias and scatter). For each site, the bias is a measure of the mean error andthe scatter is a robust estimate of the dispersion of the error around the mean. The results showed that the bias has a negative Pearson correlation coefficient with altitude, while the scatter has a positive correlation for both RZC and CPC-CV productsduring the entire period. Considering the effect of the old and the newnetworks, the errors are generally reduced using the new radar network. However, the relationship between altitude and the errors is still present. Regarding the seasonality effect, the results showed a significant underestimation at low altitudes and the weakest bias correlation in winter, while many stations showed overestimation in summer. For scatter, the correlation with altitude was highest in summer, while it was low in winter. Moreover,for low-intensity precipitation (below 1.1 mm.h−1 ) there is a negative correlation for bias and a positive correlation for scatter) with the gauge altitudes in both products. Interestingly, for high intensities (above 7 mm.h−1 ), a positive correlation for bias and a negative correlation for scatter was observed . Also, we added the bias of eight glaciers based on the snow depth measurements in addition to the gauge data. In conclusion, the results showed that almost 30% of the variance ofthe errors inboth products can be statistically explained using the gauge altitudes as a single explanatory variable.
imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?