Abstract:The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is commonly used in the reconstruction of oral cancer patients. Traditional RFFF (TRFFF) techniques, which often require a secondary donor site to repair the forearm defect, may result in a scar extending to the dorsal hand. This can lead to significant functional and aesthetic concerns in the forearm. We designed a modified RFFF (MRFFF) that incorporates a glasses-shaped flap and features deep venous drainage. To evaluate its effectiveness we conducted a retrospective chart review of 105 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent reconstructive surgery between 2018 and 2022. These patients were treated either with a TRFFF (n = 60) or the newly developed MRFFF (n = 45). Our inclusion criteria, guided by preliminary surgical experience prior to initiating the study, stipulated that single oral defects should be no larger than 6 × 6 cm2, and adjacent double defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Flap size, pedicle length, harvesting duration, and anastomosis during the surgical procedure were compared between the two techniques. Preoperative and postoperative oral function, recurrence, mortality, and dorsal scarring were recorded. One-week, one-month, and six-month postoperative subjective aesthetics assessments, and self-reported postoperative donor hand function, were measured using the Michigan hand questionnaire (MHQ). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of flap size, pedicle length, harvesting time, anastomosis time, postoperative oral function, recurrence, and mortality. However, patients with a MRFFF did not require a second donor graft site and did not have scars extending to the dorsal forearm. They also had significantly improved postoperative aesthetic outcomes (1 week: 70.6%, 1 month: 62.2%) and donor hand function (1 week: 54.6%, 1 month: 40.4%) compared with the TRFFF group (p < 0.001). The MRFFF eliminates the need for secondary donor sites and improves primary donor site outcomes. It is versatile and can be employed for either single or composite oral defects. Through extensive case studies, we have defined its specific scope: it is suitable for single defects measuring no more than 6 × 6 cm2, or for composite defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Furthermore, it does not compromise the functional recovery of the recipient site, and should be widely adopted for all qualifying patients.

Comparison of patient‐reported upper extremity disability following free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Donor site morbidity after scapula free flap surgery of head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Donor Site Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap Versus Deep Circumflex Artery Flap-A Systematic Review

Comparison of the Subjective Satisfaction of the Donor Site Morbidity: Free Radial Forearm Flap Versus Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction in Tongue Cancer Patients

Risk Factors for Postoperative Donor Site Complications in Radial Forearm Free Flaps

Analysis of the Radial Forearm Phalloplasty Donor Site: Do Dermal Matrices Improve Donor Site Morbidity?

Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review

Indications, Postoperative Outcomes, and Complications of the Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

[Clinical Comparative Study of Free Posterior Tibial Artery Perforator Flap and Radial Forearm Free Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction].

A comparison of postoperative outcomes based on recipient vessels in scalp free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

How Affected Is the Arm in Day-to-Day Life?

Full-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Split-Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Free Flap Transfer in Oral Cavity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A prospective case-control study of disability, quality of life, and functional impairment of shoulder movements after latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstruction in breast cancer patients

Comparison of Flaps From Different Sites for Repairing Postoperative Soft Tissue Defects Regarding the Quality of Life in Patients With Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review

Morbidity of Early and Late Donor-Site Complications After Free Fibular Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Bone-flap-harvest-related donor site morbidity in reconstructive jaw microsurgery: Retrospective analysis based on 220 patients over a ten-year period

Optimising oral cancer reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study on the modified radial forearm free flap technique to eliminate the need for a secondary donor site

Microsurgical reconstruction of the oral cavity with free flaps from the anterolateral thigh and the radial forearm: a comparison of perioperative data from 161 cases

Donor-site morbidity of free fibula and DCIA flaps

Quality of life and subjective donor-site morbidity in patients after a free fibula flap

“DIEP Flap vs PAP Flap vs LAP Flap: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes, Complications, and Satisfaction”