Mild modification of lignin pyrolysis vapors by metal oxide catalysts: A comparative study with molecular sieve catalysts

Xiaoting Xing,Lei Liu,Yuchun Zhang,Peng Fu,Zhiyu Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2207501
2023-05-04
Abstract:Compared with strongly acidic molecular sieve catalysts, metal oxide catalysts are less prone to deactivation by coking due to their mild acid-base properties. Several metal oxides (Al 2 O 3 , MgO, CaO, CuO, Fe 2 O 3 , NiO, ZnO, ZrO 2 , TiO 2 and CeO 2 ) were selected for mild catalytic pyrolysis of lignin and compared with molecular sieve catalysts (MCM-41, HZSM-5, ZSM-5). Among the metal oxide catalysts studied, CuO, Fe 2 O 3 and TiO 2 inhibited the formation of acids/alcohols (1–2%) and promoted the production of hydrocarbons (15.31%, 20.17% and 28.83%, respectively). Especially when TiO 2 catalyst was added, the proportion of hydrocarbons reached the highest (28.83%), but it inhibited the production of phenols (3.3%). The presence of CuO promoted the production of phenols (9.70%), showing a good deoxidation performance. Compared with the oxide catalysts, the addition of molecular sieve catalysts only resulted in 2 ~ 3% phenols. Compared with strongly acidic molecular sieve catalysts, metal oxide catalysts showed certain catalytic activity in deoxidation and cracking, and showed some advantages in the formation of phenols. GRAPHICAL
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?