Optimal rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation—ORCA study—Multicenter prospective observational study: Prognostic impact and predictors of rate control

Brigite Pedro,Antonia Mavropoulou,Mark A. Oyama,Christopher Linney,João Neves,Joanna Dukes‐McEwan,Ana P. Fontes‐Sousa,Anna R. Gelzer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16666
2023-05-03
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Abstract:Background The optimal heart rate (HR) in dogs with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Impact of HR on survival needs elucidation. Hypothesis/Objectives Dogs with a 24 hours Holter‐derived meanHR ≤125 beats per minute (bpm; rate controlled) survive longer than dogs with higher meanHR. We further aimed to determine which variables predict ability to achieving rate control. Animals Sixty dogs with AF. Methods Holter‐derived meanHR, clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker variables were analyzed prospectively. Survival was recorded from time of rate control, with all‐cause mortality as primary endpoint. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified variables independently associated with survival; Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis estimated the median survival time of dogs with meanHR ≤125 bpm vs >125 bpm. Logistic regression explored baseline variables associated with inability to achieve rate control. Results Structural heart disease was present in 56/60 dogs, 50/60 had congestive heart failure, and 45/60 died. Median time to all‐cause death was 160 days (range, 88‐303 days), dogs with meanHR >125 bpm (n = 27) lived 33 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 15‐141 days), dogs with meanHR ≤125 bpm (n = 33) lived 608 days (95% CI, 155‐880 days; P
veterinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?