Abstract:To address the lack of appropriate pediatric drugs available on the global market, in 2000 the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) issued the ICH E11 guideline regarding the Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population. This guideline considerably changes the environment of drug development for children. It has been written specifically to harmonize, promote, and facilitate high-quality and ethical clinical research for children within the ICH regions, i.e., the United States of America (USA), the European Union (EU), and Japan. This article details the various regulations applicable in each ICH region following the publication of the guideline. The framework of rewards, incentives, and obligations for pharmaceutical companies established for the development of pediatric drugs are compared. It appears that the USA and the EU have both developed specific regulations for pediatric drug development while Japan has not. However, in Japan, pharmaceutical companies (PCs) are encouraged to develop pediatric drugs voluntarily, and they may be granted additional months of market exclusivity or the postponement of the drug re-examination deadline. In both the USA and the EU, regulations aimed to increase the number of clinical studies conducted in children, in order to ensure that the necessary data are generated, determining the conditions in which a drug may be authorized to treat the pediatric population. PCs are encouraged to develop pediatric assessment, including pediatric clinical trials, which is described in a pediatric plan submitted to the relevant authorities. A system of rewards for PCs submitting an application for marketing authorization containing pediatric use information has been put in place to cover the additional investment for testing drugs in children. Subject to conditions, these rewards consist in a 6-month extension of the patent or supplementary protection. Regarding the approval for new medicinal products in these two regions, regulations require PCs to include, when it is relevant, a pediatric assessment in their drug research and development plan, which must be approved. Although these regions have implemented the ICH guideline, the regulation differs with respect to the timing of studies in children relative to adults and approval of a pediatric drug development plan. Except for special cases, the pediatric investigation plan in the EU is required to be prepared and submitted to the competent authorities upon availability of adult pharmacokinetic studies (after phase I), which means at an early phase of a new drug development plan. In the USA, the pediatric plan is requested later during the phase II or III trials. In practice, it has become difficult for pharmaceutical industries to develop a practicable clinical program for pediatrics including timelines for studies in children that satisfy both EU and USA authorities. Nevertheless, at an early stage of the development strategy, direct support and advice from competent authorities can be obtained. For the ICH regions, pediatric committees are well-established albeit less structured in Japan. Their roles are to review and assess pediatric plans, to issue recommendations, to advise pharmaceutical companies on the content and format of pediatric data to be methodically collected and analyzed, and to avoid exposing children to unnecessary or redundant clinical trials. This regulatory framework encourages the study and the development of pediatric drugs, but it is still quite difficult to actually measure the impact of the ICH E11 on increasing the number of drugs for pediatric use.

Paediatric Drug Development in Japan: Current Status and Future Challenges

[Pediatric drug development: ICH harmonized tripartite guideline E11 within the United States of America, the European Union, and Japan]

Improvement of Pediatric Drug Development: Regulatory and Practical Frameworks

Comparison of supportive regulatory measures for pediatric medical device development in Japan and the United States

Pediatric drug development in China: Reforms and challenges

[Current Status and Issues in Drug Development for Rare Cancers]

A Comparative Analysis of the Regulatory Framework and Collaborative Environment for Pediatric Medical Device Development in Japan and the United States: Identifying Challenges, Support Mechanisms, and Emerging Opportunities

Pediatric Drug Development: Reviewing Challenges and Opportunities by Tracking Innovative Therapies

Pediatric Off-Label and Unlicensed Drug Use and Its Implications

Evolving Landscape of New Drug Approval in Japan and Lags from International Birth Dates: Retrospective Regulatory Analysis

Development of Paediatric Medicines: Key Risk Factors and Non-clinical Research Programmes

Trends in innovative pediatric drug development in China based on clinical trial registration data

An Empirical Analysis of Japan's Drug Development Lag Behind the United States

Medicines for children licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA): the balance after 10 years

Current situation of pediatric clinical trials in China: focus on trials for drug marketing application and administrative approval

Recent landscape and trends for industry-sponsored pediatric clinical trials in China from 2013 to 2022

Current Status of Pediatric Labeling in China and the Near Future Efforts Needed for the Country.

Significant Differences in Drug Lag in Clinical Development Among Various Strategies Used for Regulatory Submissions in Japan

Guidance for pediatric use in prescription information for novel medicinal products in the EU and the US

Pediatric Clinical Trials in Mainland China Over the Past Decade (From 2009 to 2020)

Reflections on the regulatory field covering the development of paediatric medicinal products: a brief overview of current status and challenges