Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

Gamestop Investors as an Eng(R)Aged Digital Public

The dynamics of the Reddit collective action leading to the GameStop short squeeze

The rise and fall of WallStreetBets: social roles and opinion leaders across the GameStop saga

A Review of Fintech Brokerage, Social Media, and Concerted Retail Trading

The echo chamber effect resounds on financial markets: a social media alert system for meme stocks

From Reddit to Wall Street: The role of committed minorities in financial collective action

Turning Stocks into Memes: A Dataset for Understanding How Social Communities Can Drive Wall Street

In the Red(dit): Social Media and Stock Prices

Backlash and Sale: A Case Study on Corporate Image and Profitability of Video Game

Social Network Datasets on Reddit Financial Discussion

Exit to Community: Strategies for Multi-Stakeholder Ownership in the Platform Economy

Accounting for the “harms” of social media firms: dialogic accountability and discursive contestation in public hearings

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

Examining Crisis Communication Using Semantic Network and Sentiment Analysis: A Case Study on NetEase Games

THE ENGINE IS THE MESSAGE: VIDEOGAME INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS

Do Robinhood investors care about ESG?

Retail broker trading restrictions and market liquidity: an examination of GameStop

Social interactions in short squeeze scenarios

Playbor, gamble-play, and the financialization of digital games

Crisis-induced Public Demand for Regulatory Intervention in the Social Media Era: Examining the Moderating Roles of Perceived Government Controllability and Consumer Collective Efficacy

Investor attention and corporate leverage manipulation