Moving towards patient‐specificity for devising cone‐beam computed tomography field of views. A normative maxillary skeletal dimensional analysis

Sohaib Shujaat,Artúr Kesztyüs,Dandan Song,Tobias Regnstrand,Daniel Benchimol,Krisztian Nagy,Reinhilde Jacobs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13089
IF: 3.264
2023-05-20
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
Abstract:Aim To provide age and gender‐specific normative skeletal dimensional measurements of the maxillary region that could act as a reference for devising patient‐specific cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) field of views (FOVs). Materials and methods In this retrospective study, CBCT images of Caucasian patients were acquired and divided into different age groups ranging from 8 to 20 years. Inclusion criteria consisted of good quality CBCT images having complete maxillary skeletal region without severe metal or motion artefacts. Linear measurements were performed to evaluate 7 distance‐based variables, which included anterior nasal spine‐ posterior nasal spine (ANS‐PNS) distance, bilateral maxillary first molar's central fossae (CF) distance, palatal vault depth (PVD), bilateral palatinal cemento‐enamel junction (PCEJ) distance, bilateral vestibular CEJ (VCEJ) distance, bilateral jugulare distance (JUG) and arch length (AL). Results A total of 529 patients (243 males, 286 females) were selected based on the selection criteria. All age groups had variable maxillary dimensions, with ANS‐PNS and PVD showing the highest change in dimensions from 8 to 20 years of age. On the other hand, AL had the least variability in all age groups. Based on gender, male patients had larger dimensions compared to female patients. In addition, male patients showed a significant change in all dimensional measurements (p<0.001) compared to female patients. Conclusion The maxillary linear dimensions varied across different age groups, with male patients having significantly higher dimensions than female patients. The presented maxillary normative data could serve as a reference guide for tailoring patient‐specific CBCT FOVs.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?