Abstract:Multiple regression analyses were performed on a worldwide 236—site data set compiled from studies that compared species composition, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), root biomass, and soil nutrients of grazed vs. protected, ungrazed sites. The objective was to quantitatively assess factors relating to differential sensitivities of ecosystems to grazing by large herbivores. A key question in this assessment was: Do empirically based, broad—scale relationships correspond to ecological theories of plant—animal interactions and conceptual frameworks for management of the world's grazing lands? Changes in species composition with grazing were primarily a function of ANPP and the evolutionary history of grazing of the site, with level of consumption third in importance. Changes in species composition increased with increasing productivity and with longer, more intense evolutionary histories of grazing. These three variables explained >50% of the variance in the species response of grasslands or grasslands—plus—shrublands to grazing, even though methods of measurement and grazing systems varied among studies. Years of protection from grazing was a significant variable only in the model for shrublands. Similar variables entered models of change in the dominant species with grazing. As with species composition, sensitivities of change in dominant species were greater to varying ecosystem—environmental variables than to varying grazing variables, from low to high values. Increase of the dominant species under grazing were predicted under some conditions, and decreases were more likely among bunch grasses than other life—forms and more likely among perennials than annuals. The response of shrublands was different from that of grasslands, both in terms of species composition and the dominant species. Our analyses support the perception of grazing as a factor in the conversion of grasslands to less desirable shrublands, but also suggest that we may be inadvertently grazing shrublands more intensively than grasslands. Percentage differences in ANPP between grazed and ungrazed sites decreased with increasingly long evolutionary histories of grazing and increased with increasing ANPP, levels of consumption, or years of treatment. Although most effects of grazing on ANPP were negative, some were not, and the statistical models predicted increases in ANPP with grazing under conditions of long evolutionary history, low consumption, few years of treatment, and low ANPP for grasslands—plus—shrublands. The data and the models support the controversial hypothesis that grazing can increase ANPP in some situations. Similar to species variables, percentage differences in ANPP between grazed and ungrazed treatments were more sensitive to varying ecosystem—environmental variables than to varying grazing variables. Within levels not considered to be abusive "overgrazing," the geographical location where grazing occurs may be more important than how many animals are grazed or how intensively an area is grazed. Counter to the commonly held view that grazing negatively impacts root systems, there was no relationship between difference in ANPP with grazing and difference in root mass; as many positive as negative differences occurred, even though most ANPP differences were negative. Further, there was a weak relationship between change in species composition and change in ANPP, and no relationship with root mass, soil organic matter, or soil nitrogen. All three belowground variables displayed both positive and negative values in response to grazing. Current management of much of the world's grazing lands based on species composition criteria may lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the long—term ability of a system to sustain productivity.

Grazing effects on biological soil crusts and their interaction with shrubs and grasses in an arid rangeland

Multiscale effects on biological soil crusts cover and spatial distribution in the Monte Desert

Grazing pressure interacts with aridity to determine the development and diversity of biological soil crusts in Patagonian rangelands

Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments

Impact of Soil Biological Crusts on the Sustainability of Arid Ecosystems in Central-Western Argentina: Their Influence on Nutrient Dynamics and Soil Properties

Grazing-Induced Changes to Biological Soil Crust Cover Mediate Hillslope Erosion in Long-Term Exclosure Experiment

Nitrogen Mineralization in Grazed BSC Subsoil is Mediated by Itself and Vegetation in the Loess Plateau, China

Spatial cover and carbon fluxes of urbanized Sonoran Desert biological soil crusts

Short-term effects of non-grazing on plants, soil biota and aboveground-belowground links in Atlantic mountain grasslands

Small effects of livestock grazing intensification on diversity, abundance, and composition in a dryland plant community

The role of biological soil crusts in soil moisture dynamics in two semiarid ecosystems with contrasting soil textures

Frequency of association: a key indicator for assessing livestock grazing effects on dryland plant interactions, applicable in restoration

Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina

Influence of Vegetation Factors on Biological Soil Crust Cover on Rehabilitated Grassland in the Hilly Loess Plateau, China

Experimental impacts of grazing on grassland biodiversity and function are explained by aridity

The effects of shrub encroachment on arthropod communities depend on grazing history

Grazing changes topography-controlled topsoil properties and their interaction on different spatial scales in a semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

Biological soil crust distribution in Artemisia ordosica communities along a grazing pressure gradient in Mu Us Sandy Land, Northern China

Spatial Patterns of Soil Moisture as Affected by Shrubs, in Different Climatic Conditions

Effects of grazing on soil properties in mediterranean forests (Central-Eastern Spain)

Does land use change alter water and nutrient dynamics of phreatophytic trees in the Central Monte desert?