Abstract:Background Thoracolumbar fractures are classified into four categories according to the mechanism of injury and fracture morphology into compression fracture, burst fracture, flexion-distraction injury, and fracture dislocation. Unfortunately, the management of spinal fracture has lacked standardization given the many unanswered yet relevant questions regarding the outcome. However, management is generally divided into surgical and nonsurgical treatment such as orthosis. We aim to compare the clinical and the radiological outcomes of operative spinal fractures in patients with thoracolumbar spinal orthoses (TLSO) and patients without TLSO. Up to our knowledge, there are no similar studies comparing such management approaches in Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in King Saud Medical City which included patients over 18 years of age from the past 10 years who underwent spinal fixation with or without the use of orthotics and had at least 6 months follow-up. We have excluded any patients with degenerative diseases, spinal tuberculosis or spinal tumors. Our primary outcome was radiological outcomes and clinical outcomes among groups using orthotics postoperatively versus groups who didn’t use orthotics. Statistical analysis was done utilizing The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM statistical computing program version 21 was used for the statistical data analysis and the alpha significance level was considered at 0.050 level. Results The patients were divided into two groups, patients given TLSO postoperatively (group A) (53.1%) and patients not given TLSO postoperatively (group B) (46.9%). Most of the patients had a burst fracture and most (86.4%) had endured a single level spine fracture. Bivariate Pearson’s correlations test showed the patients mean perceived pain level [the visual analogue scale (VAS)] had correlated negatively and significantly with their emotional well-being (EM-WB) score, r=−0.132, P<0.05. Moreover, the patients self-rated pain level had correlated negatively and significantly with their satisfaction level with their comfort subscale score, r=−0.156, P<0.05. The patients mean measured kyphotic angle had correlated positively with their mean comfort level satisfaction, r=0.158, P<0.05. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test showed that the patients who used TLSO had perceived significantly greater general health (GH) score (mean GH score =77.44) compared to those who have not used TLSO (mean GH score =70.79), Z=2.38, P=0.02. Group A perceived significantly lower satisfaction with their social limitations (mean score =71.32) compared to group B (mean score =89.47) on average, Z=2.10, P=0.040. Group B (n=38) measured a significant decline in their pain level across the three time-point measured pain levels (P<0.001). Conclusions Our study concludes that both groups have noticeable reductions in pain postoperatively and have shown decent results with regards to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores. However, further research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the varying effects of bracing versus non bracing long-term outcomes in upper thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures.

Spinal Orthoses in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Quality Assessment

Effect of spinal orthoses on osteoporotic elderly patients kyphosis, back muscles strength, balance and osteoporotic vertebral fractures: (A systematic review and meta-analysis)

Comparative Efficacy of Surgical Interventions for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Is orthotic treatment beneficial for fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A propensity score matching study

Compliance with wearing a thoracolumbar orthosis in nonoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective sensor-controlled study

The Global Spine Care Initiative: a review of reviews and recommendations for the non-invasive management of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture pain in low- and middle-income communities

Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

Evaluating the Efficacy of Orthoses in the Conservative Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures – Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders

Dynamic spinal orthoses self-reported effects in patients with back pain due to vertebral fragility fractures: A multi-center prospective cohort study

Reply to Letter to the Editor: is There Really No Benefit of Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures? A Meta-analysis

Endocrine assessment, chemotherapy, nonsurgical treatment, and rehabilitation for osteoporotic spine fractures: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A narrative review

Thoracolumbar Sacral Orthosis for Spinal Fractures: What’s the Evidence and Do Patients Use Them?

The use of thoracolumbar spinal orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures

Geriatric Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Database Study Characterizing Use and Trends for Prescribed Thoracic/Lumbar Orthoses

An overview of clinical guidelines for the management of vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review

Effect of treatment on back pain and back extensor strength with a spinal orthosis in older women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial

Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Anteroposterior Surgery for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fractures with Canal Compromise: A Prospective Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Is Routine Use of External Spinal Orthoses Necessary After Operative Stabilization of Cervical Spine Injuries?

Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review