Abstract:Like all SSI, the COVID-19 pandemic requires decisions that are contentious, involve scientific thinking, and vary across social groups. This investigation determined how perceptions about COVID-19 science and sociocultural membership associate with 557 university biology students’: (1) COVID-19 behaviors after stay-at-home orders and (2) support for future societal COVID-19 responses. Hierarchical moderated multiple regression analyses demonstrate that students’ COVID-19 mitigating actions after stay-at-home orders were significantly and positively associated with, in order of importance: (1) higher levels of COVID-19 spread prevention knowledge; (2) espousing more liberal, as opposed to conservative, political orientations; (3) being female; and (4) increased disbelief of COVID-19 misinformation/disinformation claims. Furthermore, the students’ political orientation moderated the relationship between their trust in scientific models to guide COVID-19 decisions and their personal COVID-19 actions, with trust in scientific models to guide COVID-19 decision-making being a significant positive predictor of moderate, conservative, and very conservative student groups’ COVID-19 mitigating actions. Conversely, there was no association between trust in scientific models to guide COVID-19 decision-making and very liberal and liberal students’ conducting COVID-19 actions. Hierarchical moderated multiple regression analyses revealed that students’ support for societal-wide COVID-19 mitigating measures going forward is positively associated with, in order of importance: (1) espousing more liberal, as opposed to conservative, political orientations; (2) higher levels of COVID-19 spread prevention knowledge; (3) increased disbelief of COVID-19 misinformation/disinformation claims; (4) trust in scientific models for guiding COVID-19 decision-making; and (5) beliefs that factors beyond science and technology (e.g., personal actions) are necessary for pandemic resolution. Implications discussed include the importance for helping students analyze how sociocultural membership, personal biases, and trust in science interactively influence socioscientific decision-making. Further recommendations discussed include how science communication strategies must account for sociocultural variance in order to optimize trust in science and reasoned and responsible action.

How Science Influencers Polarize Supportive and Skeptical Communities Around Politicized Science: A Cross-Platform and Over-Time Comparison

Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China

Political Partisanship and Anti-Science Attitudes in Online Discussions about Covid-19

COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization

Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study

Scientists as Influencers: The Role of Source Identity, Self-Disclosure, and Anti-Intellectualism in Science Communication on Social Media

Context matters in social media

Partisan Asymmetries in Exposure to Misinformation

Can we blame social media for polarization? Counter-evidence against filter bubble claims during the COVID-19 pandemic

Socioscientific Issues Thinking and Action in the Midst of Science-in-the-Making

Belief and Persuasion in Scientific Discourse on Social Media: A Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The nature and origins of political polarization over science

Characterizing Partisan Political Narrative Frameworks about COVID-19 on Twitter

Narratives and opinion polarization: a survey experiment

Who Sets the Agenda on Social Media? Ideology and Polarization in Online Debates

The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Support for Policy

Did COVID-19 Blur Partisan Boundaries? A Comparison of Partisan Affinity and Source Heterophily in Online Alternative News-Sharing Networks Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Decoding Political Polarization in Social Media Interactions

Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms

Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media

Decoding Digital Influence: The Role of Social Media Behavior in Scientific Stratification Through Logistic Attribution Method