Abstract:G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as the most important class of pharmacological targets regulate G-protein and β-arrestin-mediated signaling through allosteric interplay, which are responsible for different biochemical and physiological actions like therapeutic efficacy and side effects. However, the allosteric mechanism underlying preferentially recruiting one transducer versus the other has been poorly understood, limiting drug design. Motivated by this issue, we utilize accelerated molecular dynamics simulation coupled with potential of mean force (PMF), molecular mechanics Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and protein structure network (PSN) to study two ternary complex systems of a representative class A GPCR (μ-opioid receptor (μOR)) bound by an agonist and one specific transducer (G-protein and β-arrestin). The results show that no significant difference exists in the whole structure of μOR between two transducer couplings, but displays transducer-dependent changes in the intracellular binding region of μOR, where the β-arrestin coupling results in a narrower crevice with TM7 inward movement compared with the G-protein. In addition, both the G-protein and β-arrestin coupling can increase the binding affinity of the agonist to the receptor. However, the interactions between the agonist and μOR also exhibit transducer-specific changes, in particular for the interaction with ECL2 that plays an important role in recruiting β-arrestin. The allosteric network analysis further indicates that Y1483.33, F1523.37, F1563.41, N1914.49, T1603.45, Y1062.42, W2936.48, F2896.44, I2485.54 and Y2525.58 play important roles in equally activating G-protein and β-arrestin. In contrast, M1613.46 and R1653.50 devote important contributions to preferentially recruit G-protein while D1643.49 and R179ICL2 are revealed to be important for selectively activating β-arrestin. The observations provide useful information for understanding the biased activation mechanism.

Subcellular location defines GPCR signal transduction

Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling is Dependent on Sub-Cellular Location

Agonist-selective Signaling is Determined by the Receptor Location Within the Membrane Domains

GPCR signalling from within the cell

Structure of the µ-opioid receptor–G i protein complex

Distinct Conformations of GPCR–β-arrestin Complexes Mediate Desensitization, Signaling, and Endocytosis

Subcellular localization of GPCR kinases differentially modulate biased signaling at CXCR3

Opioid receptors reveal a discrete cellular mechanism of endosomal G protein activation

Molecular Insights into the Allosteric Coupling Mechanism Between an Agonist and Two Different Transducers for Μ-Opioid Receptors.

Intracellular pocket conformations determine signaling through the μ opioid receptor

Agonist-induced Formation of Opioid Receptor-G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase (Grk)-Gβγ Complex on Membrane is Required for GRK2 Function in Vivo

The spatial distribution of GPCR and Gβγ activity across a cell dictates PIP3 dynamics

GPCR kinases differentially modulate biased signaling downstream of CXCR3 depending on their subcellular localization

Compartmentalized GPCR Signaling from Intracellular Membranes

Functionally Distinct and Selectively Phosphorylated GPCR Subpopulations Co-Exist in a Single Cell

Heterologous Activation of Protein Kinase C Stimulates Phosphorylation of Δ-Opioid Receptor at Serine 344, Resulting in Β-Arrestin- and Clathrin-mediated Receptor Internalization

Computational Insights into the G-protein-biased Activation and Inactivation Mechanisms of the Μ Opioid Receptor

Distinct Subcellular Distribution of δ-Opioid Receptor Fused with Various Tags in PC12 Cells

Posttranslational Regulation Of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Distinct subcellular distribution of delta-opioid receptor fused with various tags in PC12 cells.

Location-biased β-arrestin conformations direct GPCR signaling