Content comparison of campus medical amnesty policies

GracieLee M. Weaver,Scarlett Ruppert,Quazi Minhaz Tabassum,Jeffrey Milroy,Emily Kroshus,Alyssa Crawford,David Wyrick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2024.2351410
2024-05-17
Journal of American College Health
Abstract:Objective: To describe common components of medical amnesty (MA) policies and examine how MA policies differ across institutions. Participants: 50 U.S. colleges and universities with current MA policies. Methods: A checklist was developed to compare and assess the campus MA policies of 50 institutions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and regression analyses were used to examine common policy components and differences across types of institutions. Results: 40% of policies did not include a purpose statement. 42% of policies had no mention about how to use the policy. 48% did not mention restrictions on amnesty. 32% did not mention follow-up actions. 24% of policies mentioned extending amnesty for additional person(s) present. There were no significant differences in policy components across school characteristics. Conclusions: Many policies lacked detail, highlighting the need for guidelines and best practices to develop MA policies. Future research could examine the effects of these policy components on help seeking intentions.
public, environmental & occupational health,education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?