Abstract:Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eye region during face recognition, whereas Easterners consistently focus more on the nose, yet recognition accuracy is comparable (Blais et al., 2008). However, the face literature has robustly shown that the critical information for face recognition is located in the eyes and partially the mouth, but not the nose. Moreover, since eye movements in natural viewing conditions do not provide unequivocal evidence on the measure of the visual information being used by observers, the question of whether humans universally use similar facial information to recognize faces remains unresolved. To address this issue, we monitored eye movements during face recognition of thirty Western Caucasian (WC) and thirty East Asian (EA) observers with a novel technique that parametrically restricts information outside central vision. We used ‘Spotlights’ with Gaussian apertures of 2°, 5° or 8° dynamically centered on observers' fixations. Face recognition performance improved with increasing Spotlight apertures. Regardless of culture, observers actively fixated the eyes and mouth with constrained Spotlights (2°, 5°). In the 8° condition, information from both eyes and mouth was simultaneously available when fixating the nose and, as expected, only EA observers shifted their fixations towards this region. This central location is optimal to integrate information globally, a cultural marker of Easterners' perceptual strategies. WC observers engage in analytic strategies and their facial feature-by-feature strategy was not affected by Spotlight apertures. Social experience and cultural factors shape the way humans think about the world and regulate the strategies used to extract information from faces. However, these external forces do not modulate the information used to solve this critical biological feat. Human beings rely on identical facial information to recognize conspecifics, a universal law dictated by the evolutionary constraints of nature and not nurture.

Your Eyes Say You're Lying: An Eye Movement Pattern Analysis for Face Familiarity and Deceptive Cognition

An Identity Recognition Model Based on RF-RFE: Utilizing Eye-Movement Data

Putting Culture Under The 'Spotlight' Reveals Universal Information Use For Face Recognition

Lie Detection Using Brain Imaging Technology and Its Psychophysiological Basis

Tracking the Truth: The Effect of Face Familiarity on Eye Fixations during Deception

Face Recognition Subserves Nature Not Nurture

Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.

When East Meets West: Gaze-Contingent Blindspots Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements for Faces

Gender difference in spontaneous deception: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Neural Dynamics of Deception: Insights from Fmri Studies of Brain States

Intelligent Eye-Tracker-Based Methods for Detection of Deception: A Survey

Methodologies for Deception Detection Based on Abnormal Behavior

Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues

Intentional-Deception Detection Based on Facial Muscle Movements in an Interactive Social Context

Neural Alignment During Face-to-face Spontaneous Deception: Does Gender Make a Difference?

New progress in the paradigm of elicited deception : Application of human-computer interaction in deception detection

Exploring Time- and Frequency- Dependent Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks During Deception with Single-Trial Event-Related Potentials

An Honest Joker reveals stereotypical beliefs about the face of deception

Effective Connectivity in Cortical Networks During Deception: A Lie Detection Study Based on EEG

Infrared thermal imaging and eye-tracking for deception detection: a laboratory study

Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception