Development of Electro‐Conductive Composite Bioinks for Electrohydrodynamic Bioprinting with Microscale Resolution

Ayiguli Kasimu,Hui Zhu,Zijie Meng,Zhennan Qiu,Yutao Wang,Dichen Li,Jiankang He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202300056
2023-04-18
Advanced Biology
Abstract:In this work, an electro‐conductive hydrogel is prepared by introducing poly (3,4‐ethylene dioxythiophene): poly (styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) into an RGD‐functionalized alginate and fibrin system, and then electrohydrodynamic‐bioprinted to form living tissue constructs with microscale resolution and good cell viability (>85%). This might provide a promising approach for engineering conductive and cell‐laden constructs for electroactive tissue engineering. Bioprinting has attracted extensive attention in the field of tissue engineering due to its unique capability in constructing biomimetic tissue constructs in a highly controlled manner. However, it is still challenging to reproduce the physical and structural properties of native electroactive tissues due to the poor electroconductivity of current bioink systems as well as the limited printing resolution of conventional bioprinting techniques. In this work, an electro‐conductive hydrogel is prepared by introducing poly (3,4‐ethylene dioxythiophene): poly (styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) into an RGD (GGGGRGDSP)‐functionalized alginate and fibrin system (RAF), and then electrohydrodynamic (EHD)‐bioprinted to form living tissue constructs with microscale resolution. The addition of 0.1 (w/v%) PEDOT: PSS increases the electroconductivity to 1.95 ± 0.21 S m−1 and simultaneously has little effect on cell viability. Compared with pure RAF bioink, the presence of PEDOT: PSS expands the printable parameters for EHD‐bioprinting, and hydrogel filaments with the smallest feature size of 48.91 ± 3.44 μm can be obtained by further optimizing process parameters. Furthermore, the EHD‐bioprinted electro‐conductive living tissue constructs with improved resolution show good viability (>85%). The synergy of the advanced electro‐conductive hydrogel and EHD‐bioprinting presented here may provide a promising approach for engineering electro‐conductive and cell‐laden constructs for electroactive tissue engineering.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?