Extracellular volume measured by whole body CT scans predicts chronic cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapies based on anthracyclines: a retrospective study

R. Rosenfeld,S. Riondino,M. Cerocchi,A. Luciano,G. Idone,F. Illuminato,T. Alice,F. Torino,M. Chiocchi,M. Roselli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103755
IF: 4.254
2024-05-26
The Breast
Abstract:Introduction Neoadjuvant chemotherapies for breast cancer (BC) are effective but potentially cardiotoxic, and expose long survivors at risk of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Unfortunately, early screening for CTRCD has actual diagnostic limits. Myocardial extracellular volume (mECV) is a radiological marker used in cardiac CT scans and cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosis and follow-up of CTRCD. It can be measured in whole-body CT (WB-CT) scan, routinely performed in patients at high risk of relapse, to evaluate CTRCD occurrence during oncological follow-up. Methods 82 WB-CT scans were examined at baseline (T 0 ) and during oncological follow-up at first year (T 1 ) and fifth year (T 5 ) after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. mECV was measured at 1 minute (PP) and 5 minutes (DP) after contrast injection. 31 echocardiograms were retrieved in T 1 to perform a linear correlation between mECV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results mECV values in T 0 were similar between the two groups both in PP and in DP. Significant results were found for PP values in T 1 (37.0% vs 32%, p=0.0005) and in T 5 (27.2% vs 31.2%, p=0.025). A cut-off value of 35% in PP proved significant in T 1 (OR=12.4, p=0.004), while mECV was inversely correlated with LVEF both in PP (adj-S=-3.54, adj-p=0.002) and in DP (adj-S=-2.51, adj-p=0.0002), suggesting a synergistic action with the age at diagnosis (p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusions WB-CT scans performed during oncological reassessment in patients at high-risk of recurrence could be used for CTRCD screening in cardiovascular low-risk patients, especially in aging patients with mECV values above 35%.
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?