Great Chinese Famine and the Effects on Cardiometabolic Health for Future Generations
Korbua Srichaikul,Robert A. Hegele,David J.A. Jenkins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18546
IF: 9.8968
2022-02-10
Hypertension
Abstract:Is there a possibility that epigenetic changes that affect cardiovascular disease risk factors may influence outcomes over two generations or more? Although it may be challenging to determine at the molecular level the epigenetic changes that may be responsible for the transfer of risk factors from environmental insults in one generation to another, the findings of Li et al 1 provide strongly suggestive evidence that phenotypic traits that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease can be passed from one generation to another after intrauterine deprivation. Remarkably, the generation that originally suffered that intra utero deprivation may even pass these traits on to a second generation. These are the conclusions of Li et al 1 who studied those conceived and born at the height of the great Chinese famine of 1959 to 1962 that affected almost the whole of the Chinese mainland and in which it is estimated that approximately 30 million people died of starvation. See related article, pp 518–531 The authors studied the participants born at the height of the famine, 1959 to 1961, and compared them with those born both before and after the great famine so that the mean ages between the famine and the no famine study participants could be matched. Their finding that there was a higher prevalence of obesity and raised blood pressure among those born in the famine compared with those born on either side of the famine was not a major surprise, based on the literature and the increased future risk of cardiometabolic disease. 2 They demonstrated obesity rates of 11.3% and 8.5% respectively. Similar figures were seen for abdominal obesity at 12.5% versus 11.4% and hypertension at 21% and 20.6%, respectively. However, what was surprising was that, despite the younger age, the second generation showed a similar pattern with obesity at 8.2% versus 4.4%, abdominal obesity at 4.7% versus 3.4%, and hypertension as high as 34.8% versus 31.3%, respectively. Some of the hypertension in both generations could be explained by obesity, but the second-generation outcomes are impressive considering that the average age was only 25 years old. The effects of these increases in cardiovascular disease risk factors remain to be seen but are of concern especially since those second-generation members of the population will be exposed to potentially more westernized lifestyle and diet than the parents, increasing their overall risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Furthermore, the effect on blood pressure is likely to be compounded by age as has been shown by data from the siege of Leningrad, where hypertension was not seen after early life famine exposure by those entering their 50s but was significant by age 70 years. 3 The findings for the first generation are in line with the Barker hypothesis, suggesting that low birth weight infants are more prone to cardiometabolic disease in later life, 1 based on the concept of in utero development of a thrifty phenotype that is mismatched if the later environment becomes plentiful. 4 The broad implications of the hypothesis reflected in the increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases has been observed internationally. 5 The major contribution of the study by Li et al 1 is that the effect was seen not only by the generation that experienced the in utero deprivation but also by the subsequent generation that had no direct connection to the famine. Although the deprivation suffered by the fetus was in no way a reflection of the parents' choice, one is reminded of the intergenerational nature of misfortune recorded in the King James Version of the Bible, Book of Numbers 14, verse 18: "The Lord is long-suffering and a great mercy,...... visiting the iniquity (ill health) of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation." We do not know for how many generations these epigenetic changes will last, but their magnitude, shown in the present study in the second generation, is both simultaneously concerning and hypothesis-generating. What could be the molecular basis of such transgenerational effects? In contrast to genetic variants or mutations, epigenetic changes do not alter the DNA sequence. Instead, epigenetic change refers to a diverse range of extrinsic chemical modifications imposed on key regulatory regions within the genome that alter gene expression, for example, by interfering with binding of transcription factors to silence production of the protein product. 6 Direct molecular evidence of inheritance of epigenetic effects is sparse in humans but has been shown in plants and animals (see Figure). 6,7 In the mouse, for example, an environmental exposure like starvation might induce chemical changes, such as methylation or histone modification, upon genomic DNA. 8 Alternatively, the s -Abstract Truncated-
peripheral vascular disease