Impact of bortezomib‐based versus lenalidomide maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high‐risk multiple myeloma

Naresh Bumma,Binod Dhakal,Raphael Fraser,Noel Estrada‐Merly,Kenneth Anderson,César O. Freytes,Gerhard C. Hildebrandt,Leona Holmberg,Maxwell M. Krem,Cindy Lee,Lazaros Lekakis,Hillard M. Lazarus,Hira Mian,Hemant S. Murthy,Sunita Nathan,Taiga Nishihori,Ricardo Parrondo,Sagar S. Patel,Melhem Solh,Christopher Strouse,David H. Vesole,Shaji Kumar,Muzaffar H. Qazilbash,Nina Shah,Anita D’Souza,Surbhi Sidana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34778
IF: 6.9209
2023-04-08
Cancer
Abstract:Background Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression‐free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high‐risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard‐risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib‐based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT. Methods In total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel‐agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain. Results Three hundred fifty‐seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib‐based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib‐based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high‐risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?