Abstract:According to the territorial-regional development policy of Russia, a rigid structuring of the country's space is applied through the prism of a hierarchical management system. As a result, the structure of the space of the entire country was fixed through a system of boundaries, the markers of which highlight management objects at the national level, subject of the Russian Federation, territory, region, district. This article will present the main stereotypes that influence the creation of the perception of new territories in the nature of marginality. As is known, the formation of marginal communities can be traced throughout the history of civilizations. It is important to separate geographical marginality from spatial marginality. In geography, there is the concept of “marginal territories”, which can be considered those located on the remote periphery of the region or in isolated places. Such a phenomenon as spatial marginality is characterized precisely by the prevailing stereotypes in society about a specific area. Urban spatial perception critically influences human behavior and emotional responses, emphasizing the need to align urban spaces with human needs to improve the quality of urban life. However, the classification of urban architecture based on functionality is subject to biases stemming from discrepancies between objective representation and subjective perception. These biases can lead to city planning and designs that fail to adequately meet the needs and preferences of city residents, negatively impacting their quality of life and the overall functionality of the city. In this study, we apply machine learning to uncover these biases in urban spatial perception research using a three-step methodology: objective mapping, subjective perception analysis, and perceptual bias assessment. Our results show that machine learning can reveal hidden patterns in this area of research with significant implications for urban planning and design. Of particular note, the study found significant discrepancies in the distribution centroids between commercial buildings and residential or public buildings. This result sheds light on the spatial organization characteristics of urban architectural functions, serving as a valuable guide for urban planning and development. Moreover, it reveals the advantages and disadvantages of different data sources and methods for interpreting urban spatial perception, paving the way to a more complete understanding of the subject. These results highlight the importance of integrating both objective mapping and subjective perspectives when classifying the functionality of urban architecture.

Spatial Differentiation of Socio-Economic Development of the St. Petersburg Agglomeration

Modeling the Effects of Spatial Localization in Urban Agglomerations of Russia

Socio-economic situation of Russian urban agglomerations in 2015–2021

Uneven Spatial Development in Russia: Explanations of New Economic Geography

Differentiation of subjects of the Russian Federation according to the main parameters of socio-economic development

Evolution characteristics of temporal and spatial pattern of Russian economic differences since the 21st century

Digital Space of Regions: Assessment of Development Factors and Influence on Socio-Economic Growth

Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Union Urban Land Use Change of St. Petersburg

Elimination of Imbalances in Territorial Development as a Condition for Regional Competitiveness

Impact of the Allocation of Economic Resources on the Spatial Organisation of the Russian Economy

Impact of Inter-territorial Cohesion on the Development of Regional Economic Spaces

Spatial indicators of digital economy in Russia and Еurope

Retail Sprawl in Post-Soviet Urban Residential Communities: Case Studies of Saint-Petersburg and Vilnius

SOCIAL DISTANCES AS A FEATURE OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN SOCIAL SPACE

The Socio-spatial stratagems of human capital development in the Southern Federal Districts of Russia

Does geographical concentration affect the profitability of Russian enterprises?

METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN CITIES: ESG INDEX OF THE VEB.RF

Analysis of Approaches for the Measurement of the Spatial Digital Divide in Russia and Abroad

Catching-up regional strategy as a tool to reduce spatial inequality

Features of the post-industrial development of agglomerations as the core of economy

Stereotypical ideas in the perception of spatial marginality of urban outskirts