Burden of illness in Rett syndrome: initial evaluation of a disorder-specific caregiver survey
Walter E Kaufmann,Alan K Percy,Jeffrey L Neul,Jenny Downs,Helen Leonard,Paige Nues,Girish D Sharma,Theresa E Bartolotta,Gillian S Townend,Leopold M G Curfs,Orietta Mariotti,Claude Buda,Heather M O'Leary,Lindsay M Oberman,Vanessa Vogel-Farley,Katherine V Barnes,Christopher U Missling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03313-8
2024-08-13
Abstract:Background: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder associated with multiple neurologic impairments. Previous studies have shown challenges to the quality of life of individuals with RTT and their caregivers. However, instruments applied to quantify disease burden have not adequately captured the impact of these impairments on affected individuals and their families. Consequently, an international collaboration of stakeholders aimed at evaluating Burden of Illness (BOI) in RTT was organized. Methods: Based on literature reviews and qualitative interviews with parents of children and adults with RTT, a caregiver questionnaire was constructed to evaluate 22 problems (inclusive of core characteristics, functional impairments, and comorbidities) often experienced with RTT, rated mainly with a 5-level Likert scale. The questionnaire was administered anonymously online to an international sample of 756 caregivers (predominantly parents) of girls and women with RTT. Descriptive statistics were used to identify problems of high frequency and impact on affected individuals and caregivers. Chi-square tests characterized the relationship between problem severity and impact responses, while nonparametric ANOVAs of raw and z-score adjusted scores identified agreement between severity and impact on individual and caregiver. Secondary inferential tests were used to determine the roles of age, clinical type, and country of residence on BOI in RTT. Results: There was variability in reported frequency of problems, with the most prevalent, severe and impactful being those related to the core features of RTT (i.e., communication and fine and gross motor impairments). Chi-square analyses demonstrated interdependence between severity and impact responses, while ANOVAs showed that many problems had disproportionately greater impact than severity, either on affected individuals (e.g., hand stereotypies) or their caregivers (e.g., sleep difficulties, seizures, pain, and behavioral abnormalities). With certain exceptions (e.g., breath-holding, seizures), age, clinical type, or country of residence did not influence these BOI profiles. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that core features and related impairments are particularly impactful in RTT. However, problems with mild severity can also have disproportionate impact on affected individuals and, particularly, on their caregivers. Future analyses will examine the role of factors such as treatment outcomes, healthcare services, and healthcare provider's perspectives, in these BOI profiles.