Abstract:Current approaches to biodiversity conservation are largely based on geographic areas, ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, with less attention on genetic diversity and the evolutionary continuum from populations to species. Conservation management generally rests on discrete categories, such as identified species, and, for threated taxa, intraspecific units. Species, in particular, provide a common measure of biodiversity yet in both theory and nature, speciation is typically a protracted process progressing from connected populations to unambiguous species with variable rates of phenotypic, ecological and genetic divergence. Thus, most recognized species are not genetically uniform and are sometimes highly structured into historically isolated populations worthy of consideration as intraspecific units that represent unique genetic diversity for conservation. Genome screens offer unprecedented resolution of structure across taxonomic boundaries in species complexes, and have the potential to oversplit species if not interpreted conservatively. This highlights the blurred line between populations and species, and can confound simple dichotomies of “species” vs. “not species.” At the same time, like plants, there is increasing evidence that even distantly related animal species can hybridize and exchange genes. A review of conservation legislation reveals that legal definitions of “species” are quite flexible and can accommodate a range of infra-specifictaxa and divergent populations, as well as taxonomically recognized species. For example, the legislative definition of a species around the world can include: species, subspecies, varieties, and geographically and/or genetically distinct populations. In principle, this flexibility allows for protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of evolutionary processes at a broad range of infra-specific levels. However, evolutionary biologists often fail to adequately justify and then translate their evidence for genetically defined units into categories suited to assessment under local legislation. We recommend that (i) genomic data should be interpreted conservatively when formally naming species, (ii) concomitantly, there should be stronger impetus and a more uniform approach to identifying clearly justified intraspecific units, (iii) guidelines be developed for recognizing and labeling intraspecific data that align with best scientific practice, and (iv) that the more nuanced view of species and speciation emerging from genomic analyses is communicated more effectively by scientists to decision makers.

Incorporating genomics into insect conservation: Butterflies as a model group

Population genetics for insect conservation and control

Outbred genome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in butterflies

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management

How genomics can help biodiversity conservation

Population Genomics for the Management of Wild Vertebrate Populations

Transcriptome‐derived molecular resources for the conservation of threatened butterflies in Korea

New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management

Filling knowledge gaps in insect conservation by leveraging genetic data from public archives

Functional genomics of life history variation in a butterfly metapopulation

Genomics and conservation: Guidance from training to analyses and applications

The last days of Aporia crataegi (L.) in Britain: Evaluating genomic erosion in an extirpated butterfly

Whole-genome evaluation of genetic rescue: the case of a curiously isolated and endangered butterfly

Species-specific erosion of genetic diversity in grassland butterflies depends on landscape land cover

Species-specific loss of genetic diversity and exposure of deleterious mutations following agricultural intensification

How Can Genomics Help or Hinder Wildlife Conservation?

Genome-wide introgression among distantly related Heliconius butterfly species

Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation

Comparative Evolutionary Genomics in Insects